Search by keyword or author

Strategic Human Oversight Frameworks for AI-Enabled Training Microagents: Evidence from a Longitudinal Adoption Study

Published: April 15, 2026

Authors

Smrite Goudhaman

Keywords
AI enabled training, Micro agents, AI governance, Longitudinal study, Technology adoption

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine how AI-enabled training outcomes evolve as an intervention transition from a supervised doctoral pilot to a scaled, longitudinal organizational deployment. The study focuses on learning adoption and learning efficiency in a frontline hospitality context, while explicitly examining the role of AI micro-agents operating within a human-in-the-loop governance framework.

Methods: The study adopts a longitudinal cohort extension design, building on a doctoral pilot conducted with 100 frontline employees during 2024 and extending into a scaled operational deployment during 2025. Objective learning-platform trace data from an AI-enabled training system were analyzed across two deployment phases. Learning adoption was measured using exposure-adjusted completion rates, while learning efficiency was assessed using assessment performance and time-on-task metrics. The analysis controls for workforce churn characteristic of frontline service environments.

Findings: Results show that completion rates normalized from 100% in the pilot phase to 86.82% under real-world scale, reflecting operational normalization rather than reduced effectiveness. Importantly, learning quality and efficiency improved over time: mean assessment scores increased, while average time-on-task declined significantly. These findings indicate faster mastery and deeper learning as AI-enabled training matured, rather than superficial compliance.

Implications: The findings demonstrate that AI-enabled training systems can sustain adoption and improve learning efficiency at scale when designed with constrained agency and supported by human oversight. For organizations in high-churn frontline environments, the results emphasize the importance of evaluating training effectiveness beyond pilot completion metrics and focusing on longitudinal learning quality, efficiency, and governance structures.

Originality: This study provides rare longitudinal, post-dissertation evidence on AI-enabled training effectiveness, directly linking a doctoral pilot to scaled organizational deployment. It advances technology management and digital learning research by introducing a churn-aware evaluation framework and empirically demonstrating how AI micro-agents, operating within human-in-the-loop governance, shape sustainable learning outcomes beyond pilot conditions.

References

  • Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., … & Horvitz, E. (2019, May). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
  • Aradhyula, G. (2024). Human-in-the-loop machine learning systems. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(1), 514–521. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0012
  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel psychology41(1), 63-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
  • Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2021). The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics13(1), 333-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180386
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015). Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of experimental psychology: General144(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
  • Dote Pardo, J. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in organizational learning: a systematic review of applications, opportunities, and challenges. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-06-2025-0228
  • Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2019). Cognitive challenges in human-AI collaboration: Investigating the path towards productive delegation (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3368813). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3368813
  • Hemmer, P., Schemmer, M., Kühl, N., Vössing, M., & Satzger, G. (2025). Complementarity in human-AI collaboration: Concept, sources, and evidence. European Journal of Information Systems34(6), 979-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2025.2475962
  • Muehlemann, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption and workplace training. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization238, 107206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107206
  • Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Conboy, K. (2025). Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems34(2), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885
  • Pappas, I. O., Giannakos, M. N., & Sampson, D. G. (2019). Fuzzy set analysis as a means to understand users of 21st-century learning systems: The case of mobile learning and reflections on learning analytics research. Computers in Human Behavior92, 646-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.010
  • Passmore, J., & Daly, J. (2026). Are AI Coaching Agents Learning Friend or Foe?: A Qualitative Study of Learning and Development Leaders’ Perceptions of AI Coaching Agents Using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2. International Journal of Training and Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.70028
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of management review46(1), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1MIS quarterly27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1MIS quarterly36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

How to Cite

Smrite Goudhaman. Strategic Human Oversight Frameworks for AI-Enabled Training Microagents: Evidence from a Longitudinal Adoption Study. J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2025, 16, 87-102
Strategic Human Oversight Frameworks for AI-Enabled Training Microagents: Evidence from a Longitudinal Adoption Study

Current Issue

PeriodicityBiannually
Issue-1June
Issue-2December
ISSN Print0976-545X
ISSN Online2456-3226
RNI No.CHAENG/2016/68678

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies(J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License

Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/

Visibility, Memberships and Ethics