Search by keyword or author

Generational Differences in Perceived Value in Showrooming: Examining Offline Search, Online Purchase Benefits, and Consumer Factors

Published: April 2, 2026

Authors

Paramjit Singh and Pavleen Soni

Keywords
Generation Y, Generation Z, Measurement invariance of composite models, Multigroup analysis, Showrooming

Abstract

Purpose: Technology advancement has made customers practice a new habit where they inspect products in physical stores, i.e., through an offline channel, before purchasing the same product through online channels (i.e., through websites or apps), and this is known as showrooming. This research paper focuses on generational differences, particularly Gen Z and Gen Y.

Methods: Data were collected from 1,000 female respondents in India belonging to the Gen Y and Gen Z age groups who were involved in the purchase of makeup and colour cosmetics products, with 804 valid responses retained after excluding incomplete questionnaires. Judgmental sampling was adopted because of the nature of the study, as this research needed participants who had prior showrooming experience. For analysis purposes, MICOM and MGA techniques were used.

Findings: The findings reveal generational differences in perceived value: price consciousness significantly influences Gen Y consumers, whereas the need for touch and social interaction exerts stronger effects among Gen Z shoppers. Both generations, however, demonstrate similar preferences toward technology-based features such as AI-based chatbot problem solving and entertainment through smart shopping carts.

Implications: This study contributes to the literature of retail management by examining a new type of buying behaviour known as showrooming. The findings indicate that Gen Z and Gen Y behave differently in some aspects but similarly when it comes to technology. Retailers, entrepreneurs, and managers can develop strategies based on these findings in order to attract more customers and satisfy their needs.

Originality: This research makes use of MICOM and MGA techniques to study the behaviour of different generations while practicing the showrooming phenomenon, which is one of its kind.

References

  • Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence for university industry creativity and sustainability. Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 16(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge/2025.161003
  • Agrawal, D. K. (2022). Determining behavioural differences of Y and Z generational cohorts in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(7), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-12-2020-0527
  • Arora, S., & Sahney, S. (2018). Antecedents to consumers’ showrooming behaviour: An integrated TAM TPB framework. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-07-2016-1885
  • Arora, S., Parida, R. R., & Sahney, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ showrooming behaviour: A stimulus organism response (S O R) perspective. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48(11), 1157–1176. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-01-2020-0033
  • Arora, S., Sahney, S., & Parida, R. R. (2022). Drivers of showrooming behaviour: Insights from integrated perspectives. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-09-2020-0374
  • Arora, S., Singha, K., & Sahney, S. (2017). Understanding consumer’s showrooming behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(2), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-06-2016-0111
  • Brettel, M., Engelen, A., Heinemann, F., & Vadhanasindhu, P. (2008). Antecedents of market orientation: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of International Marketing, 16(2), 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.16.2.84
  • Burns, D. J., Gupta, P. B., Bihn, H. C., & Hutchins, J. (2018). Showrooming: An exploratory empirical investigation of students’ attitudes and behavior. Information Systems Management, 35(4), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1503802
  • Chen, J., Le, T., & Florence, D. (2021). Usability and responsiveness of artificial intelligence chatbot on online customer experience in e retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(11), 1512–1531. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-08-2020-0312
  • Chen, M., & Lu, T. (2011). Modeling e coupon proneness as a mediator in the extended TPB model to predict consumers’ usage intentions. Internet Research, 21(5), 508–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111176344
  • Chung, M., Ko, E., Joung, H., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Chatbot e service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 117, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.004
  • Close, A. G., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2010). Beyond buying: Motivations behind consumers’ online shopping cart use. Journal of Business Research63(9-10), 986-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.022
  • Cotarelo, M., Fayos, T., Calderón, H., & Mollá, A. (2021). Omni channel intensity and shopping value as key drivers of customer satisfaction and loyalty. Sustainability, 13(11), 5961. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115961
  • Cron, W. L., Alavi, S., Habel, J., Wieseke, J., & Ryari, H. (2021). No conversion, no conversation: Consequences of retail salespeople disengaging from unpromising prospects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00763-x
  • De Mesquita, J. M. C., Shin, H., Longuinho, J. P., & Moura, L. R. C. (2024). The consequences of showrooming behaviour on customer satisfaction and loyalty. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 52(12), 1125–1141. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-01-2024-0024
  • Fassnacht, M., Beatty, S. E., & Szajna, M. (2019). Combating the negative effects of showrooming: Successful salesperson tactics for converting showroomers into buyers. Journal of Business Research, 102, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.020
  • Frasquet, M., & Miquel-Romero, M. J. (2021). Competitive (versus loyal) showrooming: An application of the push-pull-mooring framework. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services62, 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102639
  • Gensler, S., Neslin, S. A., & Verhoef, P. C. (2017). The showrooming phenomenon: It’s more than just about price. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.003
  • Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
  • Hall, A., Towers, N., & Shaw, D. R. (2017). Understanding how millennial shoppers decide what to buy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(5), 498–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-11-2016-0206
  • Hamouda, M. (2019). Omni channel banking integration quality and perceived value as drivers of consumers’ satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 608–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-12-2018-0279
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-09-2014-0304
  • Hsiao, C., Yen, H. J. R., & Li, E. Y. (2012). Exploring consumer value of multi channel shopping: A perspective of means end theory. Internet Research, 22(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211235671
  • Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  • Kim, J., & Hahn, K. H. (2015). The effects of self monitoring tendency on young adult consumers’ mobile dependency. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.009
  • Kim, N., Park, J., Kim, K. H., Aiello, G., & Donvito, R. (2012). A study on measuring and defining customer equity of complex shopping malls. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 3(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2012.10593109
  • Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2010). Investigating dimensionality of multichannel retailer’s cross channel integration practices and effectiveness: Shopping orientation and loyalty intention. Journal of Marketing Channels, 17(4), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046669x.2010.512859
  • Lee, H., Xu, Y., & Porterfield, A. (2022). Antecedents and moderators of consumer adoption toward AR‐enhanced virtual try‐on technology: a stimulus‐organism‐response approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies46(4), 1319-1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12760
  • Li, Y., Li, B., Zheng, W., & Chen, X. (2021). Reveal or hide? Impact of demonstration on pricing decisions considering showrooming behavior. Omega102, 102329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102329
  • Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000208
  • Natarajan, T., & Veera Raghavan, D. R. (2024). How integrated store-service quality promotes omnichannel shoppers’ word-of-mouth behaviors: the moderating role of perceived relationship investment and the shopper’s perceived value. The TQM Journal36(4), 1113-1144. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-12-2022-0364
  • Pandey, S., & Chawla, D. (2018). Online customer experience (OCE) in clothing e retail. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(3), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-01-2017-0005
  • Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Enhancing the online decision making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.05.011
  • Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 765–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.014
  • Pereira, M. L., De La Martinière Petroll, M., Soares, J. C., De Matos, C. A., & Hernani Merino, M. (2023). Impulse buying behaviour in omnichannel retail: An approach through the stimulus organism response theory. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-09-2021-0394
  • Priporas, C., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058
  • Quach, S., Barari, M., Thaichon, P., & Moudrý, D. V. (2023). Price promotion in omnichannel retailing: How much is too much? Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(1), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-07-2021-0475
  • Rapp, A., Baker, T. L., Bachrach, D. G., Ogilvie, J., & Beitelspacher, L. S. (2015). Perceived customer showrooming behavior and the effect on retail salesperson self efficacy and performance. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.12.007
  • Rohm, A. J., & Swaminathan, V. (2004). A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. Journal of business research57(7), 748-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00351-x
  • Sahu, K. C., Khan, M. N., & Gupta, K. D. (2021). Determinants of webrooming and showrooming behavior: A systematic literature review. Journal of Internet Commerce, 20(2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2020.1863041
  • Santos, S., & Gonçalves, H. M. (2019). Multichannel consumer behaviors in the mobile environment: Using fsQCA and discriminant analysis to understand webrooming motivations. Journal of Business Research, 101, 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.069
  • Schneider, P. J., & Zielke, S. (2020). Searching offline and buying online: An analysis of showrooming forms and segments. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101919
  • Shankar, A., & Jain, S. (2022). Investigating webrooming behavior: A case of Indian luxury consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-09-2021-0227
  • Shankar, A., Gupta, M., Tiwari, A. K., & Behl, A. (2025). How does convenience impact showrooming intention? Omnichannel retail strategies to manage global retail apocalypse. Journal of Strategic Marketing33(3), 394-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254x.2021.1965189
  • Sharma, N., & Dutta, N. (2025). Generational dynamics of omnichannel customers: Analysing shopping preferences across diverse product types. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 53(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-04-2024-0173
  • Sharma, N., & Fatima, J. K. (2023). Influence of perceived value on omnichannel usage: Mediating and moderating roles of the omnichannel shopping habit. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103627
  • Sharma, P. (2021, September 6). The rise of the Indian millennial. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/the-rise-of-the-indian-millennial/
  • Singh, N., Fassott, G., Chao, M. C., & Hoffmann, J. A. (2006). Understanding international web site usage. International Marketing Review, 23(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330610646304
  • Sit, J. K., Hoang, A., & Inversini, A. (2018). Showrooming and retail opportunities: A qualitative investigation via a consumer-experience lens. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services40, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.004
  • Slaton, K., & Testa, D. S. (2023). Small concept luxury department stores: Psychographic characteristics affecting patronage intentions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51(6), 826–844. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-11-2022-0475
  • Tandon, U. (2025). Chatbots, virtual-try-on (VTO), e-WOM: modeling the determinants of attitude’and continued intention with PEEIM as moderator in online shopping. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication74(1-2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-06-2022-0125
  • Thangavel, P., Pathak, P., & Chandra, B. (2021). Millennials and Generation Z: A generational cohort analysis of Indian consumers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(7), 2157–2177. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2020-0050
  • Van Baal, S., & Dach, C. (2005). Free riding and customer retention across retailers’ channels. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20036
  • Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. C. (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, 43(2), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166074
  • Yang, H. (2013). Market mavens in social media: Examining young Chinese consumers’ viral marketing attitude, eWOM motive, and behavior. Journal of Asia Pacific Business, 14(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2013.756337

How to Cite

Paramjit Singh and Pavleen Soni. Generational Differences in Perceived Value in Showrooming: Examining Offline Search, Online Purchase Benefits, and Consumer Factors. J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2025, 16, 74-86
Generational Differences in Perceived Value in Showrooming: Examining Offline Search, Online Purchase Benefits, and Consumer Factors

Current Issue

PeriodicityBiannually
Issue-1June
Issue-2December
ISSN Print0976-545X
ISSN Online2456-3226
RNI No.CHAENG/2016/68678

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies(J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License

Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/

Visibility, Memberships and Ethics