The Influence of Algorithmic Management on Employees Perceptions of Organisational Justice – A Conceptual Paper

Home > 2024, Vol. 15, No. 1 > The Influence of Algorithmic Management on Employees Perceptions of Organisational Justice – A Conceptual Paper

Published: April 10, 2024

Download PDF

| Download HTML

Authors

Shefali Sharma, Priyanka Sharma, and Rohit Sharma

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge/2024.151004

Keywords
Organisational justice, Algorithmic management, Perceived organisational support, Distributive justice, Procedural justice, Interpersonal justice, Interactional justice

Abstract

Background: The use of algorithms in organizations has become increasingly common, with many companies transitioning managerial control from humans to algorithms. While algorithmic management promises significantly efficiency gains, it overlooks an important factor of employees’ perception of fairness towards their workplace. Employees pay close attention to how they perceive justice in the workplace; their behavior is shaped by these perceptions.

Purpose: This study aims to explore how algorithmic management systems can be designed to balance efficiency with transparency and fairness. So, to foster a sense of justice, organizations should design algorithmic systems in such a way to ensure a transparent decision-making process where employees clearly understand how decisions are made and can trust the outcomes.

Method: A review of literature on algorithmic management and workplace fairness was conducted, focusing on the impact of transparent decision-making processes, equitable resource distribution, and constructive feedback mechanisms on employee trust and engagement.

Results: Providing timely and constructive feedback and equal distribution of resources can foster a strong sense of fairness, making employees valued and connected to the organization. This will enhance employee trust, engagement, and overall organizational performance, as workers will be more likely to align with the company’s goals when they are treated fairly.

Conclusion: Organizations should prioritize fairness and transparency in the design of algorithmic management systems. Treating employees fairly not only strengthens their connection to the organization but also aligns their efforts with its objectives.

References

Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67(5), 422. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571135651366420608
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change, 25(2), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529421998818
Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of organizational change management, 15(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423080
Baiocco, S., Fernández-Macías, E., Rani, U., & Pesole, A. (2022). The Algorithmic Management of work and its implications in different contexts (No. 2022/02). JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/262292
Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306296602
Bernerth, J. B., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Cole, M. S. (2006). Perceived fairness in employee selection: The role of applicant personality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 545-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9022-2.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social justice research, 1, 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048016
Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street‐level to system‐level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public administration review, 62(2), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168
Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C., & Bies, R. J. (1994). Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of management Journal, 37(2), 397-409. https://doi.org/10.5465/256835
Bucher, E. L., Schou, P. K., & Waldkirch, M. (2021). Pacifying the algorithm–Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531
Bujold, A., Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Gaudet, M. C. (2022). Opacity behind the wheel: The relationship between transparency of algorithmic management, justice perception, and intention to quit among truck drivers. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 8, 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100245
Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 3(1), 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
Cheng, M. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2021). A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100698
Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Wash. L. Rev., 89, 1.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 386. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2001-06715-002
Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 633. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.633
Colquitt, J. A., Zapata-Phelan, C. P., & Roberson, Q. M. (2005). Justice in teams: A review of fairness effects in collective contexts. Research in personnel and human resources management, 53-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(05)24002-1
Crawford, K. (2021). The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press.
Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. BCL Rev., 55, 93. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/bclr55&div=5&id=&page=
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27868379
Cropanzano, Russell & Rupp, Deborah & Mohler, Carolyn & Schminke, Marshall. (2001). Three roads to organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. 20. 1-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20001-2.
Curchod, C., Patriotta, G., Cohen, L., & Neysen, N. (2020). Working for an algorithm: Power asymmetries and agency in online work settings. Administrative science quarterly, 65(3), 644-676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
Daly, J. P., & Geyer, P. D. (1994). The role of fairness in implementing large‐scale change: Employee evaluations of process and outcome in seven facility relocations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(7), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150703
Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & technology, 29(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
Dolata, M., Feuerriegel, S., & Schwabe, G. (2022). A sociotechnical view of algorithmic fairness. Information Systems Journal, 32(4), 754-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12364
Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and app‐work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2019). Empowering Users to Detect Data Analytics Discriminatory Recommendations. In ICIS. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301383872.pdf
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1986-31507-001
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.005
Feuerriegel, S., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2020). Fair AI: Challenges and opportunities. Business & information systems engineering, 62, 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00645-0
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management journal, 32(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.5465/256422
Foster, R. D. (2010). Resistance, justice, and commitment to change. Human resource development quarterly, 21(1), 3-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20041
Geissinger, A., Laurell, C., Öberg, C., Sandström, C., & Suseno, Y. (2022). The sharing economy and the transformation of work: Evidence from Foodora. Personnel review, 51(2), 584-602. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2019-0450
Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N., & Lu, Y. (2015). Change process characteristics and resistance to organisational change: The role of employee perceptions of justice. Australian Journal of Management, 40(1), 89-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896213501953
Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2022). Dependency and hardship in the gig economy: The mental health consequences of platform work. Socius, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231221082414
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of applied psychology, 71(2), 340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600204
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 54(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1006
Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2013). Handbook of organizational justice. Psychology Press.
Gregory, K. (2021). ‘My life is more valuable than this’: Understanding risk among on-demand food couriers in Edinburgh. Work, Employment and Society, 35(2), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020949568
Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Socius, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119870041
Guendelsberger, E. (2019). On the clock: What low-wage work did to me and how it drives America insane. Hachette UK.
Heaven, W. D. (2020). The UK is dropping an immigration algorithm that critics say is racist. AI MIT Technology Review.
Hill, K. (2021). Algorithmic insecurity, schedule non standardness, and gig worker wellbeing. Schedule Nonstandardness, and Gig Worker Wellbeing (January 25, 2021). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3773164
Horvath, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological forecasting and social change, 146, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021
Jabagi, N., Croteau, A. M., & Audebrand, L. (2020). Perceived organizational support in the face of algorithmic management: a conceptual model. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64231
Jago, A. S., Carroll, G. R., & Lin, M. (2022). Generating authenticity in automated work. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(1), 52. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2022-40063-001
Jarrahi, M. H., & Sutherland, W. (2019). Algorithmic management and algorithmic competencies: Understanding and appropriating algorithms in gig work. Information in Contemporary Society: 14th International Conference, iConference 2019, Washington, DC, USA, March 31–April 3, 2019, Proceedings 14, 578-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_55
Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 20539517211020332. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332
Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Organizational justice and stress: the mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of applied psychology, 89(3), 395. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2004-95165-001
Kane, G. C., Young, A. G., Majchrzak, A., & Ransbotham, S. (2021). Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. Mis Quarterly, 45(1), 371-396. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/14606
Keith, M. G., Harms, P. D., & Long, A. C. (2020). Worker health and well-being in the gig economy: A proposed framework and research agenda. Entrepreneurial and small business stressors, experienced stress, and well-being, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-355520200000018002
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of management annals, 14(1), 366-410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
Kroll, J. A., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2016). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol165/iss3/3/
Lamers, L., Meijerink, J., Jansen, G., & Boon, M. (2022). A Capability Approach to worker dignity under Algorithmic Management. Ethics and information technology, 24(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09640-3
Lee, M. K. (2018). Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 2053951718756684. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718756684
Lesala Khethisa, B., Tsibolane, P., & Van Belle, J. P. (2020). Surviving the Gig economy in the global south: How Cape Town domestic workers cope. The Future of Digital Work: The Challenge of Inequality: IFIP WG 8.2, 9.1, 9.4 Joint Working Conference, IFIPJWC 2020, Hyderabad, India, December 10–11, 2020, Proceedings, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77887-1_6
Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations. Advances in experimental social psychology/Academic Press.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2
Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M. E., & Moilanen, M. (2004). Perceived procedural justice and employee responses to an organizational merger. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 13(3), 391-413.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
Martínez‐Tur, V., Peiró, J. M., Ramos, J., & Moliner, C. (2006). Justice perceptions as predictors of customer satisfaction: The impact of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 36(1), 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00005.x
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 35(3), 626-637. https://doi.org/10.5465/256489
Mohlmann, M., & Zalmanson, L. (2017). Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers.’ Autonomy’, in proceedings of the international conference on information systems (ICIS), Seoul South Korea, 10-13.
Nagtegaal, R. (2021). The impact of using algorithms for managerial decisions on public employees’ procedural justice. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101536
Newlands, G. (2021). Algorithmic surveillance in the gig economy: The organization of work through Lefebvrian conceived space. Organization Studies, 42(5), 719-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900
Newman, D. T., Fast, N. J., & Harmon, D. J. (2020). When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 149-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.005
Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 15(1), 73-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
Parent-Rocheleau, X., & Parker, S. K. (2022). Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Human resource management review, 32(3), 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100838
Park, M. S., Jo, H., Lee, H., Jung, S. Y., & Hwang, H. J. (2022). Machine learning-based COVID-19 patients triage algorithm using patient-generated health data from nationwide multicenter database. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 11(2), 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00600-4
Parkin, J. (2011). Adaptable due process. U. Pa. L. Rev., 160, 1309.
Paterson, J. M., Green, A., & Cary, J. (2002). The measurement of organizational justice in organizational change programmes: A reliability, validity and context‐sensitivity assessment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(4), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119565
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2002-15406-008
Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Univ of California Press.
Rosenblat, A., Levy, K. E., Barocas, S., & Hwang, T. (2017). Discriminating tastes: Uber’s customer ratings as vehicles for workplace discrimination. Policy & Internet, 9(3), 256-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.153
Saunders, M. N., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Organisational justice, trust and the management of change: An exploration. personnel Review, 32(3), 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310467660
Shah, N. (2011). A study of the relationship between organisational justice and employee readiness for change. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(3), 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391111122835
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(3), 434. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1997-06155-009
Su, Y., Ma, C., Chen, J., Wu, H., Luo, W., Peng, Y., & Li, H. (2020). Printable, highly sensitive flexible temperature sensors for human body temperature monitoring: a review. Nanoscale Research Letters, 15, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-020-03428-4
Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910
Tao, K., Tzou, P. L., Nouhin, J., Gupta, R. K., de Oliveira, T., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., & Shafer, R. W. (2021). The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nature Reviews Genetics, 22(12), 757-773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00408-x
Thibaut, J. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000797754273408
Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. (2012). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. Justice in the workplace, 49-66.
Viscelli, S. (2016). The big rig: Trucking and the decline of the American dream. Univ of California Press.
Walker, M., Fleming, P., & Berti, M. (2021). ‘You can’t pick up a phone and talk to someone’: How algorithms function as biopower in the gig economy. Organization, 28(1), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420978831
Wilson, H. J., Daugherty, P. R., & Morini-Bianzino, N. (2018). The jobs that artificial intelligence will create. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11645.003.0020
Wood, A. J. (2021). Algorithmic management consequences for work organisation and working conditions (No. 2021/07). JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/233886
Yean, T. F. (2016). Organizational justice: A conceptual discussion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 798-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.082

How to Cite

Shefali Sharma, Priyanka Sharma, and Rohit Sharma. The Influence of Algorithmic Management on Employees Perceptions of Organisational Justice – A Conceptual Paper. J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2024, 15, 31-40

The Influence of Algorithmic Management on Employees Perceptions of Organisational Justice – A Conceptual Paper

Current Issue

Periodicity	Biannually
Issue-1	May
Issue-2	November
ISSN Print	0976-545X
ISSN Online	2456-3226
RNI No.	CHAENG/2013/50088

OA Policy

Publisher's policy of the journal at Sherpa UK for the submitted, accepted, and published articles. Click OAPolicy

Plan-S Compliance

To check compliance, one has to use the Journal Check Tool (JCT). This tool provided by cOAlition S (European funders) for the researchers (fundee) to check the compliance with the journal.

Recommend journal to your library

You can recommend the journal being a researcher or faculty member to your library. We will post a copy of the Journal to your library on your behalf at free of cost.
Click here: Recommend Journal

Preprint Arxiv Submission

The authors are encouraged to submit the author’s copy (preprint) to appropriate preprint archives e.g. https://arxiv.org and/or on https://indiarxiv.org or institutional repositories (e.g., D Space) before paper acceptance by the editor of Journal. After publications of the paper author(s) should mention the citation information, title and abstract along with DOI number of the publication carefully on the required page of the depository(ies).

Contact: Phone: +91-172-2741000, +91-172-4691800

Email : editor.tmg@chitkara.edu.in;

Abstract and Indexing

Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies(J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/