Fostering Dynamic Learner engagement in the Era of Blended learning- A Systematic Review

Published: October 15, 2023

Authors

Rajiv Saini and Shuchi Dawra

Keywords
Blended learning, Learner engagement, Active participation, Pedagogical tactics

Abstract

Background: Blended learning, which integrates traditional face-to-face education with digital and online elements, has gained prominence in recent years as an efficient method to enhance student learning experiences. But it is worth noting that the completion rate of online and blended learning courses continues to be rather low, as indicated by research.

Purpose: The purpose of the current study is to understand the intellectual discussion around dynamic learner engagement in the era of blended learning so that the areas of improvement can be earmarked and suitable strategies can be made to bridge the gap between the expectations of the learners and the actual delivery of the course.

Method: A systematic review was conducted using a replicable search strategy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) statement guided this study. Many keyword combinations were searched for in the title, keyword, and abstract fields, according to the search criteria to arrive at the final corpus of papers.

Result: The study found that in order to cultivate learners’ engagement in blended learning, it is imperative to investigate the various aspects that impact learning engagement. Through a comprehensive analysis of existing scholarly literature, the present study has successfully discovered a range of both internal and external elements that exert a significant influence on the level of engagement exhibited by learners. Active participation by students and innovative pedagogical tactics emerged as significant aspects in a blended learning format, allowing designers and educators to provide targeted support for students.

Conclusion: The study provides clear insights for instructors into the various methods to strategize around in the blended learning environment format so that they can design better pedagogical tactics and increase learner engagement through active student participation.

References

  • Adams, D., Tan, M. H. J., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Students’ readiness for blended learning in a leading Malaysian private higher education institution. Interactive Technology and Smart Education18(4), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-03-2020-0032
  • Akyüz, H. İ., & Samsa, S. (2009). The effects of blended learning environment on the critical thinking skills of students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences1(1), 1744-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.308
  • Alamri, M. M. (2023). A model of e-learning through achievement motivation and academic achievement among university students in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability15(3), 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032264
  • Alemayehu, L., & Chen, H. L. (2023). Learner and instructor-related challenges for learners’ engagement in MOOCs: A review of 2014–2020 publications in selected SSCI indexed journals. Interactive Learning Environments31(5), 3172-3194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1920430
  • Al-Shahwan, A. (2015). The effect of blended learning in the direct achievement and the reflecting thinking for the first secondary student in subject matter of management information systems (Doctoral dissertation, Master’s Thesis). Middle East University, Amman, Jordan).
  • Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and practice of online learning2, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.004
  • Atapattu, T., Thilakaratne, M., Vivian, R., & Falkner, K. (2019). Detecting cognitive engagement using word embeddings within an online teacher professional development community. Computers & Education140, 103594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.020
  • Barak, M., Watted, A., & Haick, H. (2016). Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education94, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
  • Batra, S., Wang, H., Nag, A., Brodeur, P., Checkley, M., Klinkert, A., & Dev, S. (2022). DMCNet: Diversified model combination network for understanding engagement from video screengrabs. Systems and Soft Computing4, 200039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2022.200039
  • Bielawski, L., & Metcalf, D. S. (2003). Blended elearning: Integrating knowledge, performance, support, and online learning. Human Resource Development. ISBN 0-87425-717-4
  • Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of asynchronous learning networks16(1), 59-77.
  • Blieck, Y., Kauwenberghs, K., Zhu, C., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., & DePryck, K. (2019). Investigating the relationship between success factors and student participation in online and blended learning in adult education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning35(4), 476-490.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12351
  • Boitshwarelo, B. (2009). Exploring blended learning for science teacher professional development in an African context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning10(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i4.687
  • Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education55(2), 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.004
  • Bonk, C. J., Olson, T. M., Wisher, R. A., & Orvis, K. L. (2002). Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance17(3), 97-118.
  • Breien, F. S., & Wasson, B. (2021). Narrative categorization in digital game‐based learning: Engagement, motivation & learning. British Journal of Educational Technology52(1), 91-111.
  • Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Agilant Learning1(11), 1-10.
  • Chan, S. L., Lin, C. C., Chau, P. H., Takemura, N., & Fung, J. T. C. (2021). Evaluating online learning engagement of nursing students. Nurse Education Today104, 104985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104985
  • Choy, J. L. F., & Quek, C. L. (2016). Modelling relationships between students’ academic achievement and community of inquiry in an online learning environment for a blended course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology32(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2500
  • Collis, B., Bianco, M., Margaryan, A., & Waring, B. 2005). Putting blended learning to work: a case study from a multinational oil company. Education, Communication & Information, 5(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310500350471
  • Deng, Y. A Systematic Review of Application of Machine Learning in Curriculum Design Among Higher Education. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies4(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.57020/ject.1475566
  • Digout, J., & Samra, H. E. (2023). Interactivity and Engagement Tactics and Tools. In Governance in Higher Education: Global Reform and Trends in the MENA Region (pp. 151-169). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40586-0_8
  • Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning1(4), 1-4.
  • Dzakırıa, H., Don, M. S., & Rahman, H. D. A. (2012). Blended learning (BL) as pedagogical alternative to teach business communication course: Case study of UUM executive diploma program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education13(3), 297-315.
  • Eldeeb, S. (2019). An investigation into students’ views on blended learning at the English Language Institute in King Abdulaziz University. Arab World English Journal: Special Issue: Application of Global ELT Practices in Saudi Arabia Septemberhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3472203
  • Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2016). The role of oral participation in student engagement. Communication Education65(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1066019
  • Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 333-350). Routledge.
  • Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online learning23(2), 145-178.
  • Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implications. The Amer. Jrnl. of Distance Education23(2), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640902857713
  • Hiver, P. (2022). Engaging the learner: Linking teaching practice to learners’ engagement and development. Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide, 51-59.
  • Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom (Vol. 11). Multilingual Matters.
  • Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education98, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
  • Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Social Innovations Journal, (6).
  • Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education52(1), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
  • Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education122, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
  • Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., & Oh, E. (2008). The present and future state of blended learning in workplace learning settings in the United States. Performance improvement47(8), 5-16.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20018
  • Kim, M. K., & Kim, S. M. (2020). Dynamic learner engagement in a wiki-enhanced writing course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education32(3), 582-606.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09248-5
  • Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education14, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
  • Kizilcec, R. F., Reich, J., Yeomans, M., Dann, C., Brunskill, E., Lopez, G., … & Tingley, D. (2020). Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(26), 14900-14905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921417117
  • Lahza, H., Khosravi, H., & Demartini, G. (2023). Analytics of learning tactics and strategies in an online learner sourcing environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning39(1), 94-112.
  • Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Qi, D., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Understanding the role of learner engagement in determining MOOCs satisfaction: A self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments31(9), 6084-6098. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2028853
  • Liyanagunawardena, T., Adams, A., Rassool, N., & Williams, S. (2014). Blended learning in distance education: Sri Lankan perspective. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT10(1).
  • Maxwell, S., & Mucklow, J. (2012). e‐Learning initiatives to support prescribing. British journal of clinical pharmacology74(4), 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04300.x
  • Mercer S, Dörnyei Z (2020) Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mubayrik, H. F. B. (2018). The present and future state of blended learning at workplace-learning settings in adult education: A systematic review. Journal of Social Studies Education Research9(4), 247-273.
  • Noe, R. A., Tews, M. J., & McConnell Dachner, A. (2010). Learner engagement: A new perspective for enhancing our understanding of learner motivation and workplace learning. The Academy of Management Annals4(1), 279-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.493286
  • Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. 2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies–How do they affect one another?. Learning and Instruction66, 101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101285
  • Ogunyemi, A. A., Quaicoe, J. S., & Bauters, M. 2022). Indicators for enhancing learners’ engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open3, 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100088
  • Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media2(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj372.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Patil, S., & Shinde, G. (2010, July). Transforming Indian higher education through blended learning approach. In 2010 International Conference on Technology for Education (pp. 145-148). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2010.5550043
  • Paul, A. K., & Richard, A. N. (2017). Blended learning approach on students’ academic achievement and retention: A case study of air force secondary school rivers state, Nigeria.
  • Peterson, R. M. (2001). Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301233004
  • Philp J, Duchesne S (2016) Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36: 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094
  • Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of asynchronous learning networks13(1), 7-18.
  • Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning37(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642
  • Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning32(3), 202-217.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131
  • Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science363(6423), 130-131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958
  • Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. 2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society11(3), 216-223.
  • Slameto, S. (2010). Critical thinking and its affecting factors. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora18(2), 1-11.
  • Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell162(5), 933-936.  https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v18i2.5187
  • Suhasini, R., & Suganthalakshmi, T. (2015). Corporate e-learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research4(1), 176.
  • Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. (2019). Driving high inclination to complete massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivation and engagement factors for learners. Electronic Journal of e-Learning17, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.2.05
  • Veluvali, P., & Surisetti, J. (2022). Learning management system for greater learner engagement in higher education—A review. Higher Education for the Future9(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211049855
  • Wang, R., Cao, J., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. 2022, December). Learning engagement in massive open online courses: A systematic review. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 1074435). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1074435

How to Cite

Rajiv Saini and Shuchi Dawra. Fostering Dynamic Learner engagement in the Era of Blended learning- A Systematic Review. J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2023, 14, 61-71
Fostering Dynamic Learner engagement in the Era of Blended learning- A Systematic Review

Current Issue

PeriodicityBiannually
Issue-1May
Issue-2November
ISSN Print0976-545X
ISSN Online2456-3226
RNI No.CHAENG/2013/50088
OA Policy

Publisher's policy of the journal at Sherpa UK for the submitted, accepted, and published articles. Click OAPolicy

Plan-S Compliance

To check compliance, one has to use the Journal Check Tool (JCT). This tool provided by cOAlition S (European funders) for the researchers (fundee) to check the compliance with the journal.

Recommend journal to your library

You can recommend the journal being a researcher or faculty member to your library. We will post a copy of the Journal to your library on your behalf at free of cost.
Click here: Recommend Journal

Preprint Arxiv Submission

The authors are encouraged to submit the author’s copy (preprint) to appropriate preprint archives e.g. https://arxiv.org and/or on https://indiarxiv.org or institutional repositories (e.g., D Space) before paper acceptance by the editor of Journal. After publications of the paper author(s) should mention the citation information, title and abstract along with DOI number of the publication carefully on the required page of the depository(ies).

Contact: Phone: +91-172-2741000, +91-172-4691800

Email : editor.tmg@chitkara.edu.in;

Abstract and Indexing

Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies(J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License

Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/

Visibility, Memberships and Ethics