Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States
Home >
2015,
Vol. 6 No. 2 > Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States
Authors
- Tareef HusainCentre for Studies in Economics and Planning, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
Keywords
Learning region, Performance, Pharmaceutical industry, Indian states, Technological factors, Regional factors
Abstract
In the extent literature, availability of critical regional and technology-based factors have been recognized as the constituents of learning region which in turn lead to the rising performance of enterprises located in the region. These regional factors subsume sub-national policies, vertical industries, knowledge institution, skill, demand and infrastructural factors. Pharmaceutical industry is one of the knowledge-intensive industries, which is theoretically believed to be performed better in a learning region. The present study takes into account two Indian states namely, Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh and describes the status of pharmaceutical industry in the light of learning region. The descriptive explanation based on time series data for the last two decades revealed that the rising trends of pharmaceutical industry in the state of Himachal Pradesh, sourced by the conducive policy supports, rising share of chemical industry, rising enrolements in higher education and availability of good infrastructure. On the other hand, despite encompassing considerable infrastructure, skilled labour, knowledge and demand, Gujarat has reported constant or marginally declining trends of pharmaceutical industry, in terms of number of units, output and employment during last decade.
References
- Amiti, M. (1998) âNew trade theories and industrial location in the EU: A survey of evidenceâ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14:2, pp. 45â53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.45.
- Asiedu, E., and Donald, L. (2004) âCapital controls and foreign direct investmentâ, World Development, 32:3, pp. 479â490.
- Asheim, B. T., and Isaksen, A. (2002) âRegional innovation systems: The integration of local âstickyâ and global âubiquitousâ knowledgeâ, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27:1, pp. 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794.
- Asiedu, E. and Donald, L. (2004) âCapital controls and foreign direct investmentâ, World Development, 32:3, pp. 479â490.
- Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., and Kortum, S. (2003) âPlants and productivity in international tradeâ, American Economic Review, 93:4, pp. 1268â1290.
- Chaudhuri, S. (2002) âEconomic reforms and industrial structure in Indiaâ, Economic and Political Weekly, 37:2, pp. 155-162.
- Cooke, P. (2001) âFrom technopoles to regional innovation systems: The evolution of localized technology development policyâ, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24:1, pp. 21-40.
- Cooke, P. (2004) âEvolution of regional innovation systems â Emergence, theory, challenge for actionâ, in Cooke P. (ed.), Regional Innovation Systems, (2nd, pp.1-18), London: Routledge.
- Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., and Todtling, F. (2000) âThe governance of innovation in Europeâ, London: Pinter.
- Cooke, P., Uranga, G. M., and Etxebarria, G. (1997) âRegional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensionsâ, Research Policy, 26:4-5, pp. 475-491.
- Desmet, K., and Parente, S. L. (2010) âBigger is better: Market size, demand elasticity, and innovationâ, International Economic Review, 51:2, pp. 319â333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2010.00581.x.
- Faggian, A. and McCann P. (2009) âHuman capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regionsâ, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33:2, pp. 317â333. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cje/ben042.
- Florida, R. (1995) âToward the learning regionâ, Futures, 27:5, pp. 527-536.
- Freeman C., Clark J. and Soete L. (1982) âUnemployment and technical innovationâ, London: Pinter.
- Freeman, C. (1987) âTechnology policy and economic performanceâ, London: Pinter.
- Gashi, P., I. Hashi, and G. Pugh (2014) âExport behaviour of SMEs in transition countriesâ Small Business Economics, 42:2, pp. 407-435.
- Government of Gujarat (2003) âBT Policyâ, Department of Industries and mines.
- Government of Gujarat (2003) âIndustrial Policyâ, Department of Industries and Mines.
- Government of Gujarat (2007) âBT Policyâ, Department of Industries and Mines.
- Government of Gujarat (2009) âIndustrial Policyâ, Department of Industries and Mines.
- Government of Himachal Pradesh (1999) âIndustrial Policyâ, Department of Industries.
- Government of Himachal Pradesh (2004) âIndustrial Policyâ, Department of Industries.
- Government of India (2013) âNew industrial policy and other concessions for the state of Uttaranchal and the state of Himachal Pradeshâ, No.1 (10)/2001-NER, New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion.
- Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994) âEndogenous innovation in the theory of growthâ, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8:1, pp. 23â44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23.
- Iammarino, S., and McCann, P. (2006) âThe structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spilloversâ, Research Policy, 35:7, pp. 1018-1036.
- Jha, R. (2007) âOptions for Indian pharmaceutical industry in the changing environmentâ, Economic and Political Weekly, 42:39, pp.3958-3967.
- Joseph, K.J., and Abraham, V. (2009) âUniversityâindustry interactions and innovation in India: Patterns, determinants, and effects in select industriesâ, Seoul Journal of Economics, 22:4, pp. 467â498.
- Krugman, P. (1991) âIncreasing returns and economic geographyâ, Journal of Political Economy, 99:3, pp. 483â499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261763.
- Lalitha, N. (2002) âIndian pharmaceutical industry in WTO regime: A SWOT analysisâ, Economic and Political Weekly, 37:34, pp. 3342-3555.
- Lundvall, B. (1992) âNational systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learningâ London: Pinter.
- Maillat, D. (1998) âFrom the industrial district to the innovative milieu: Contribution to an analysis territorialized production organizationsâ, Discussion Paper: UniversitĂ© de Neutchatel.
- Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2002) âThe elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clusteringâ, Environment and Planning, 34:3, pp. 429-449. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1068/a3457.
- Mariussen, A. (2001) âCluster policies â Cluster development?â, Stockholm: Nordregio Report, No. 01/2.
- Maskell, P. (2001) âTowards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical clusterâ, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10:4, pp. 921-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.921.
- Melitz (2003) âThe impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivityâ, Econometrica, 71:6, pp. 1695â1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
- Morgan, K. (1997) âThe learning regions: Institutions, innovation and regional renewalâ, Regional Studies, 31:5, pp. 491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289.
- Neogi, C, Kamiike, A, and Sato, T. (2014) âFactors behind the performance of pharmaceutical industries in Indiaâ, Economic and Political Weekly, 49:52, pp. 81-89 OECD (2000) âSmall and medium-sized enterprises: Local strength, global reachâ, Paris. Porter, M. E. (1990) âThe competitive advantage of nationsâ, London: Basingstoke Macmillan.
- Porter, M. E. (1998) âClusters and the new economics of competitionâ, Harvard Business Review, 76:6, pp. 77-90.
- Porter, M. E. (2000) âLocation, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economyâ, Economic Development Quarterly, 14:1, pp. 15-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105.
- Pradhan, J. P. (2011) âRegional heterogeneity and firmsâ RandD in Indiaâ, Innovation and Development, 1:2, pp. 259-282.
- Pradhan, J. P. (2013) âThe geography of patenting In India: Patterns and determinantsâ, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 50595.
- Rutten, R.P., and Boekema, F.W.M. (eds.) (2007) âThe Learning Region: Foundations, State of the Art, Future, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
- Sexenian, A. L. (1996) âInside-out: Regional networks and industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128â, Journal of Policy Development and Research, 2:2, pp. 41-60.
- Singhi, M.C. (2012) âReport on the role of incentives in the development of industrially backward States/UTsâ, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Office of the Economic Advisor, Paper No. 39.
- Subrahmanya, M.H.B. (1995) âReservation policy for small-scale industry: Has it delivered the goodsâ, Economic and Political Weekly, 3:21, pp. 51-54.
- Venkatesan R., and Varma S. (2000), âStudy on policy competition among states in India for attracting direct investmentâ, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi.
- Wheeler, D., and Ashoka M. (1992) âInternational investment location decisions: The Case of U.S. Firmsâ, Journal of International Economics, 33:1-2, pp. 57-76.
- Wolfe, D. (2003) âClusters old and new: The transition to a knowledge economy in Canadaâs regionsâ, Kingston: Queenâs School of Policy Studies.
How to Cite
Tareef Husain. Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States.
J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2015, 06, 45-64