Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States

Authors

  • Tareef HusainCentre for Studies in Economics and Planning, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar
Keywords
Learning region, Performance, Pharmaceutical industry, Indian states, Technological factors, Regional factors

Abstract

In the extent literature, availability of critical regional and technology-based factors have been recognized as the constituents of learning region which in turn lead to the rising performance of enterprises located in the region. These regional factors subsume sub-national policies, vertical industries, knowledge institution, skill, demand and infrastructural factors. Pharmaceutical industry is one of the knowledge-intensive industries, which is theoretically believed to be performed better in a learning region. The present study takes into account two Indian states namely, Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh and describes the status of pharmaceutical industry in the light of learning region. The descriptive explanation based on time series data for the last two decades revealed that the rising trends of pharmaceutical industry in the state of Himachal Pradesh, sourced by the conducive policy supports, rising share of chemical industry, rising enrolements in higher education and availability of good infrastructure. On the other hand, despite encompassing considerable infrastructure, skilled labour, knowledge and demand, Gujarat has reported constant or marginally declining trends of pharmaceutical industry, in terms of number of units, output and employment during last decade.

References

  • Amiti, M. (1998) ‘New trade theories and industrial location in the EU: A survey of evidence’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14:2, pp. 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.2.45.
  • Asiedu, E., and Donald, L. (2004) ‘Capital controls and foreign direct investment’, World Development, 32:3, pp. 479–490.
  • Asheim, B. T., and Isaksen, A. (2002) ‘Regional innovation systems: The integration of local “sticky” and global “ubiquitous” knowledge’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 27:1, pp. 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794.
  • Asiedu, E. and Donald, L. (2004) ‘Capital controls and foreign direct investment’, World Development, 32:3, pp. 479–490.
  • Bernard, A., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., and Kortum, S. (2003) ‘Plants and productivity in international trade’, American Economic Review, 93:4, pp. 1268–1290.
  • Chaudhuri, S. (2002) ‘Economic reforms and industrial structure in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 37:2, pp. 155-162.
  • Cooke, P. (2001) ‘From technopoles to regional innovation systems: The evolution of localized technology development policy’, Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24:1, pp. 21-40.
  • Cooke, P. (2004) ‘Evolution of regional innovation systems – Emergence, theory, challenge for action’, in Cooke P. (ed.), Regional Innovation Systems, (2nd, pp.1-18), London: Routledge.
  • Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., and Todtling, F. (2000) ‘The governance of innovation in Europe’, London: Pinter.
  • Cooke, P., Uranga, G. M., and Etxebarria, G. (1997) ‘Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions’, Research Policy, 26:4-5, pp. 475-491.
  • Desmet, K., and Parente, S. L. (2010) ‘Bigger is better: Market size, demand elasticity, and innovation’, International Economic Review, 51:2, pp. 319–333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2010.00581.x.
  • Faggian, A. and McCann P. (2009) ‘Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33:2, pp. 317–333. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cje/ben042.
  • Florida, R. (1995) ‘Toward the learning region’, Futures, 27:5, pp. 527-536.
  • Freeman C., Clark J. and Soete L. (1982) ‘Unemployment and technical innovation’, London: Pinter.
  • Freeman, C. (1987) ‘Technology policy and economic performance’, London: Pinter.
  • Gashi, P., I. Hashi, and G. Pugh (2014) ‘Export behaviour of SMEs in transition countries’ Small Business Economics, 42:2, pp. 407-435.
  • Government of Gujarat (2003) ‘BT Policy’, Department of Industries and mines.
  • Government of Gujarat (2003) ‘Industrial Policy’, Department of Industries and Mines.
  • Government of Gujarat (2007) ‘BT Policy’, Department of Industries and Mines.
  • Government of Gujarat (2009) ‘Industrial Policy’, Department of Industries and Mines.
  • Government of Himachal Pradesh (1999) ‘Industrial Policy’, Department of Industries.
  • Government of Himachal Pradesh (2004) ‘Industrial Policy’, Department of Industries.
  • Government of India (2013) ‘New industrial policy and other concessions for the state of Uttaranchal and the state of Himachal Pradesh’, No.1 (10)/2001-NER, New Delhi: Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion.
  • Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1994) ‘Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8:1, pp. 23–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.1.23.
  • Iammarino, S., and McCann, P. (2006) ‘The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers’, Research Policy, 35:7, pp. 1018-1036.
  • Jha, R. (2007) ‘Options for Indian pharmaceutical industry in the changing environment’, Economic and Political Weekly, 42:39, pp.3958-3967.
  • Joseph, K.J., and Abraham, V. (2009) ‘University–industry interactions and innovation in India: Patterns, determinants, and effects in select industries’, Seoul Journal of Economics, 22:4, pp. 467–498.
  • Krugman, P. (1991) ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99:3, pp. 483–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261763.
  • Lalitha, N. (2002) ‘Indian pharmaceutical industry in WTO regime: A SWOT analysis’, Economic and Political Weekly, 37:34, pp. 3342-3555.
  • Lundvall, B. (1992) ‘National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning’ London: Pinter.
  • Maillat, D. (1998) ‘From the industrial district to the innovative milieu: Contribution to an analysis territorialized production organizations’, Discussion Paper: Université de Neutchatel.
  • Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2002) ‘The elusive concept of localization economies: Towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering’, Environment and Planning, 34:3, pp. 429-449. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1068/a3457.
  • Mariussen, A. (2001) ‘Cluster policies – Cluster development?’, Stockholm: Nordregio Report, No. 01/2.
  • Maskell, P. (2001) ‘Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10:4, pp. 921-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.921.
  • Melitz (2003) ‘The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity’, Econometrica, 71:6, pp. 1695–1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.
  • Morgan, K. (1997) ‘The learning regions: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal’, Regional Studies, 31:5, pp. 491-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132289.
  • Neogi, C, Kamiike, A, and Sato, T. (2014) ‘Factors behind the performance of pharmaceutical industries in India’, Economic and Political Weekly, 49:52, pp. 81-89 OECD (2000) ‘Small and medium-sized enterprises: Local strength, global reach’, Paris. Porter, M. E. (1990) ‘The competitive advantage of nations’, London: Basingstoke Macmillan.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998) ‘Clusters and the new economics of competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76:6, pp. 77-90.
  • Porter, M. E. (2000) ‘Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 14:1, pp. 15-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105.
  • Pradhan, J. P. (2011) ‘Regional heterogeneity and firms’ RandD in India’, Innovation and Development, 1:2, pp. 259-282.
  • Pradhan, J. P. (2013) ‘The geography of patenting In India: Patterns and determinants’, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 50595.
  • Rutten, R.P., and Boekema, F.W.M. (eds.) (2007) ‘The Learning Region: Foundations, State of the Art, Future, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Sexenian, A. L. (1996) ‘Inside-out: Regional networks and industrial adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128’, Journal of Policy Development and Research, 2:2, pp. 41-60.
  • Singhi, M.C. (2012) ‘Report on the role of incentives in the development of industrially backward States/UTs’, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Office of the Economic Advisor, Paper No. 39.
  • Subrahmanya, M.H.B. (1995) ‘Reservation policy for small-scale industry: Has it delivered the goods’, Economic and Political Weekly, 3:21, pp. 51-54.
  • Venkatesan R., and Varma S. (2000), ‘Study on policy competition among states in India for attracting direct investment’, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi.
  • Wheeler, D., and Ashoka M. (1992) ‘International investment location decisions: The Case of U.S. Firms’, Journal of International Economics, 33:1-2, pp. 57-76.
  • Wolfe, D. (2003) ‘Clusters old and new: The transition to a knowledge economy in Canada’s regions’, Kingston: Queen’s School of Policy Studies.

How to Cite

Tareef Husain. Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States. J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2015, 06, 45-64
Learning Region and Performance of Pharmaceutical Industry: Evidence from Two Indian States

Current Issue

PeriodicityBiannually
Issue-1May
Issue-2November
ISSN Print0976-545X
ISSN Online2456-3226
RNI No.CHAENG/2013/50088
OA Policy

Publisher's policy of the journal at Sherpa UK for the submitted, accepted, and published articles. Click OAPolicy

Plan-S Compliance

To check compliance, one has to use the Journal Check Tool (JCT). This tool provided by cOAlition S (European funders) for the researchers (fundee) to check the compliance with the journal.

Recommend journal to your library

You can recommend the journal being a researcher or faculty member to your library. We will post a copy of the Journal to your library on your behalf at free of cost.
Click here: Recommend Journal

Preprint Arxiv Submission

The authors are encouraged to submit the author’s copy (preprint) to appropriate preprint archives e.g. https://arxiv.org and/or on https://indiarxiv.org or institutional repositories (e.g., D Space) before paper acceptance by the editor of Journal. After publications of the paper author(s) should mention the citation information, title and abstract along with DOI number of the publication carefully on the required page of the depository(ies).

Contact: Phone: +91-172-2741000, +91-172-4691800

Email : editor.tmg@chitkara.edu.in;

Abstract and Indexing

Information

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies(J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.) by Chitkara University Publications are Open Access articles that are published with licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- CC-BY 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/. This license permits one to use, remix, tweak and reproduction in any medium, even commercially provided one give credit for the original creation.

View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode

View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons License

Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/

Members