Access Over Ownership – Trust and Sustainability in Evolving Consumer Preferences
Home >
2024,
Vol. 15, No. 2 > Access Over Ownership – Trust and Sustainability in Evolving Consumer Preferences
Published: October 10, 2024
Authors
Nitin Patwa, Dhrupad Mathur, Umesh Kothari, and Ahmed Nadzry Azlil
Keywords
Sustainability, Consumer preferences, Ownership, Digital platforms
Abstract
Background: The sharing economy (SE) has transformed traditional consumption patterns, emphasizing access over ownership. Digital platforms have expanded the scope of sharing beyond close social circles, creating an ecosystem where trust and sustainability play a crucial role. While prior research has explored the economic and technological drivers of the SE, there is a growing need to understand the psychological mechanisms influencing consumer participation. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the Mindset Theory of Action Phases (MAP) offer insights into the motivational and cognitive factors driving individuals toward shared consumption.
Purpose: This study examines the interplay between trust, sustainability, and consumer attitudes toward the sharing economy, exploring how intrinsic and extrinsic motivations shape participation. Specifically, it investigates how psychological needs and mindset shifts influence engagement in SE platforms and whether sustainability concerns act as a moderating factor.
Methods: A quantitative research design used structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyze survey data from respondents. The study develops and tests a conceptual framework linking trust, sustainability, and consumer motivation, incorporating latent constructs derived from SDT and MAP.
Results: Preliminary findings indicate that trust significantly mediates consumer willingness to participate in SE platforms. Sustainability considerations also enhance participation, particularly among consumers with strong intrinsic motivation. The results further suggest that individuals with a deliberative mindset are more likely to engage in SE when sustainability benefits are evident, while those with an implemental mindset focus more on trust and economic incentives.
Conclusion: This study contributes to the growing discourse on consumer psychology in the sharing economy by integrating motivation theories with sustainability and trust factors. The findings have practical implications for platform designers and policymakers seeking to foster greater participation in SE models.
References
- Alberta Andreotti, G. A. (n.d). Participation in the Sharing Economy. Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy.
- Anthony Quinones, A. A. (2015). Technology and Trust: How the Sharing Economy is Changing Consumer Behavior. U.S. Banking Watch.
- Belk, R. (2007). Why Not Share Rather than Own? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
- Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 715-734.
- Botsman, R. &. (2010). What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way we Live.
- Buda Gabriella, L. J. (n.d). The spreading of the sharing economy and its impact on customers’ behaviours.
- Cloonan, M. V. (2007). The Moral Imperative to Preserve. Library Trends 55(3).
- Comparative Study on Sharing Economy in EU and ECORL Consortium Countries. (n.d.). ECORL Economy Co-responsibility Learning.
- Daoud, J. I. (2017 ). Multicollinearity and Regression Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
- David Gefen, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services.
- Deci, E. L. (2012). Self-determination Theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 416-436.
- Dijkstra, T. a. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 297-316.
- Egelman, S. (2013). My profile is my password, verify me!: the privacy/convenience tradeoff of Facebook Connect, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2369-2378.
- Elliot, C. (2016). Airbnb Runs’ Illegal Hotels,’ Hotel Industry. Fortune.
- Francis, R. S. (2018). Emotional Intelligence, Perceived Organisation Support and Organisation Citizenship Behaviour: Their Influence on Job Performance among Hotel Employees.
- Gao Y, W. X. (2010). A cognitive model of trust in e-commerce: evidence from a field study in China. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(1), 37-44.
- Giulia Ranzini, M. E. (n.d). Privacy in the Sharing Economy. EU H2020 Research Project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy.
- Giulia Ranzini, M. E. (n.d). Privacy in the Sharing Economy. Report from the EU H2020 Research Project Ps2Share: Participation, Privacy, and Power in the Sharing Economy.
- Gomes, A. (n.d). Give or Take: A comparative analysis of demand sharing among the Menraq and Semai of Malaysia. Ethnography and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge.
- Hair, J. H. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),. Sage.
- Heimans, J. A. (2014, July 18). ‘Understanding ‘New Power’. Retrieved from Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/2014/12/understanding-new-power
- Inglehart, R. (2020). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.
- Jin, H. T. (2005). A community-based trust model for P2P networks. High-Performance Computing And Communications. Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(1), 37-44.
- Joseph F. Hair, J. J. (2018). When to use and how to report the result of PLS-SEM. European Business Review · December 2018.
- Juho Hamari, M. S. (2015). The Sharing Economy: Why People Participate in Collaborative Consumption. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 2047-2059.
- Kamal, P. A. (2016). Trust in Sharing Economy. PACIS 2016 Proceedings, (p. 109).
- Koen Frenkena, J. S. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 3-10.
- Kong, Y., Wang, Y., Hajli, S., & Featherman, M. (2020). In sharing economy, we trust: Examining the effect of social and technical enablers on millennials’ trust in sharing commerce. Computers in human behavior, 108, 105993.
- Koopman, C. -M.–T. (2014). The Sharing Economy and Consumer Protection Regulation: The Case for Policy Change. Mercatus Working Paper.
- Léonel Matar, G. A. (2019). Motivation of the Sharing Economy Users in the Middle East: The Case of Lebanon. Journal of Internet and e-Business Studies.
- Lombard M, D. T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
- LoMonaco-Benzing, R. (2018). A sharing economy beyond the consumer: an exploration of micro-retail sharing enterprises (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri–Columbia).
- Lutz, C. H. (2014). Beyond just politics: A systematic literature review of online participation. Retrieved from First Monday: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5260/4094
- Mathias Lecuyer, M. T. (2017). Improving the Transparency of the Sharing Economy. WWW 2017 Companion.
- Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196-218.
- Naveed, M. S. (n.d). Consumer Intention & Credibility; Mediating Role ofInformativeness Towards Mobile Advertisement. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/40584590/Consumer_Intention_and_Credibility_Mediating_role_of_Informativeness_Towards_Mobile_Advertisement.
- Nielsen. (2013). nielsen.com. Retrieved from UNDER THE INFLUENCE: CONSUMER TRUST IN ADVERTISING: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2013/under-the-influence-consumer-trust-in-advertising/
- O’Regan. (2013). 11 Couchsurfing through the Lens of Agential Realism: Intra-Active Constructions of Identity and Challenging the Subject-Object Dualism. The Host Gaze in Global Tourism, 161.
- Oates. (2015, June 16). Airbnb’s ambition is to be a superbrand that defines a generation. Retrieved from http://skift.com/2015/11/17/airbnbwants
- Palvia, P. (2009). The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: A unified model. Information & Management, 46, 213-220.
- Peter M.Gollwitzer, L. K. (2016). Mindset Theory.
- Peterson, N. (1993). Demand sharing: reciprocity and the pressure for generosity among foragers. American Anthropologist 95 (4), 860–74.
- Rigdon, E. (2012). Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning.
- Sapkota, P., Keenan, R. J., & Ojha, H. R. (2018). Community institutions, social marginalization, and the adaptive capacity: A case study of a community forestry user group in the Nepal Himalayas. Forest Policy and Economics, 92, 55-64.
- Sarstedt, M. a. (2019). A Concise Guide to Market Research: The Process, Data, and. Springer.
- Sarstedt, M. D. (2016). Selecting single items to measure doubly-concrete constructs: a cautionary tale. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 8, pp. 3159-3167.
- Sarstedt, M. H. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 10.
- Schor, J. &. (2017). The new sharing economy: enacting the eco habits. Social Change and the Coming of Post-consumer Society: Theoretical Advances and Policy Implications, 246.
- Segú, M. (2018). Do short-term rent platforms affect rents? Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
- Shiau, W. L., & Luo, M. M. (2012). Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2431-2444.
- Solove, D. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.
- Stolle, D. (2002). Trusting strangers – The concept of generalized trust in perspective. OZP State Institute of Science and Politics, 31(4), 397-412
- Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism.MIT Press.
- Warren, S. &. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
- Woolf, N. (2016). Airbnb regulation deals with London and Amsterdam, which marks dramatic policy shifts.
- Yan. (1996). The flow of gifts: Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. University Press.
- Zaglia, M. E. (2013). Brand communities embedded in social networks. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 216-223.
How to Cite
Nitin Patwa, Dhrupad Mathur, Umesh Kothari, and Ahmed Nadzry Azlil. Access Over Ownership – Trust and Sustainability in Evolving Consumer Preferences.
J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2024, 15, 56-68
