Structural Source of the Trap of ICT Advancement – Lessons from World ICT Top Leaders
Home >
2014,
Vol. 5 No. 2 > Structural Source of the Trap of ICT Advancement – Lessons from World ICT Top Leaders
Authors
- Chihiro WatanabeTokyo Seitoku University Japan and University of Jyvaskyla,Finkand
- Kasheef NaveedUniversity of Jyvaskyla, Finland.
- Weilin ZhaoFujitsu Research Institute, Japan.
Keywords
Trap of ICT advancement, Two Faces of ICT, ICT Leaders, Anger of Consumer
Abstract
In light of the significant consequence of the trap of dramatic advancement of information and communication technology (ICT) in the global economy, both nations and firms that have been compelling their productivity decline. This resulted in great stagnation of ICT advanced economies and therefore its structural sources were analyzed. Based on an empirical analysis tracing, the trend in marginal productivity of ICT and its subsequent prices among the top ICT leaders in the world over the last two decades correlating with the effects of ICT, two faces of ICT advancement were identified. On one side, advancement of ICT contributes to its prices increase by new functionality development, its dramatic advancement particularly centered by internet results in the decline of its prices through freebies, easy copying, and standardization. It was demonstrated that the success of ICT leaders could largely be attributed to the way in which the two faces of ICT advancement were managed by maximizing the positive face of ICT advancement. This is done by means of the effective utilization of external resources in innovation while minimizing the negative face by outsourcing price decreasing factors. All of the aforementioned points can be invaluable lessons for global sustainability in both ICT advanced and growing economies in the midst of the advancement of ICT. The significance of innovation-consumption co-emergence for harnessing the vigor of counterparts is discussed.
References
- Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) âProductivity Paradox of Information Technology.â, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36:12, pp. 66-77.
- Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996) âParadox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spendingâ, Management Science, 42:4, pp. 541-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541.
- Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1998) âBeyond the Productivity Paradox: Computers are the Catalyst for Bigger Changesâ, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 41:8, pp. 49-55.
- Brynjolfsson, E. and McAfee, A. (2011) âRace against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and Economyâ, New York. Digital Frontier Press.
- Cowen, T. (2011) âThe Great Stagnationâ, New York. Dutton
- David, P.A. (1990) âThe Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Productivity Paradox.â, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,
- 80:2, pp. 355-361.
- Dedric, J. and Kraemer, K. (2001) âThe Productivity Paradox: Is It Rosolved? Is There a New One? What Does It All Mean for Managers?â, CRITO Consortium Advisory Board Panel: The End of the Productivity Paradox?, pp. 2-12.
- Ilmola, L. and Casti, J. (2013) âSeven Shocks and Finlandâ, Innovation and Supply Chain Management, 7:3, pp. 112-124.
- Japanâs Cabinet Office (JCO) (2012) National Survey of Lifestyle Preferences, JCO, Tokyo.
- Kraemer, K.L. and Dedrick, J. (1994) âPayoffs from Investment in Information Technology:- Lessons from the Asia-Pacific Regionâ, World Development, 22: 12, pp. 1921-1931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90183-X.
- Lichtenberg, F.R. (1995) âThe Output Contributions of Computer Equipment and Personnel: A Firm Level Analysis.â Economic Innovations and New Technology, 3:3-4, pp. 201-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4540.
- Lowrey, A. ( 2011) Impacts of the Great Stagnation, New York Times.
- Matsuda, H. (2010) âWhy not Buy, How to Purchaseâ, Tokyo, Asahi-shimbun.
- Matsuda, H. (2012) âExtricating from Stagnation as a Consequence of Consumption Hatingâ, Tokyo, PHP Institute.
- McDonagh, D. (2008) âSatisfying Needs beyond the Functional: The Changing Needs of the Silver Market Consumerâ, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Silver Market Phenomenon – Business Opportunities and Responsibilities in the Aging Society, Tokyo.
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication (MIC) (2012) White Paper on Japanâs Information and Communication Technology. MIC, Tokyo.
- Modigliami, T .(1965) âLife Cycle Hypothesis of Savings, the Demand for Wealth and Supply of CapitalâPaper Presented at the Rome Congress of Econometric Society.
- National Accounts Official Country Data (United Nations Statistics Division, annual issues).
- Ogden, T.(2012) âThe Race vs. the Stagnationâ, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring.
- Rifkin, J. (2011) âThe Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the Worldâ, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Rifkin, J. (2013) âThe Third Industrial Revolution: How the Internet, Green Electricity, and 3-D Printing are Ushering in a Sustainable Era of a Distributed Capitalismâ, The World Financial Review.
- Solow, R. (1987) âWeâd better Watch Out: The Myth of the Post-industrial Economyâ, New York Times Book Review 36.
- The Conference Board Total Economy DatabaseT (2013) (online) (Available from) <URL:http://www.conference-board.org/data/economydatabase/>
- Triplett, J.E. (1999) âThe Solow Productivity Paradox: What do Computers do Productivity?â, Canadian Journal of Economics, 32:2, pp. 309-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/136425.
- Watanabe, C., Zhu, B. and Miyazawa, T. (2001) âHierarchical Impacts of the Length of Technology Waves: An Analysis of Technolabor Homeostasisâ, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68:1, pp. 81-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00106-2.
- Watanabe, C., Asgari, B. and Nagamatsu, A. (2003) âVirtuous Cycle between R&D Functionality Development and Assimilation Capacity for Competitive Strategy in Japanâs Hightechnology Industryâ Technovation, 23:11, pp. 879-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00041-X.
- Watanabe, C. (2009) Co-evolutionary Dynamism between Innovation and Institutional Systems: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese System of Management of Technology, in: Tokyo Institute of Technology, The Science of Institutional Management of Technology:Elucidation of Japanâs Indigenous Co-evolutionary Dynamism and Its Accrual to GlobalAssets. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, pp. 21-34.
- Watanabe, C., Nasuno, M. and Shin, J.H. (2011) âUtmost Gratification of Consumption by means of Supra-functionality Leads a Way to Overcoming Global Economic Stagnationâ, Journal of Services Research, 11:2, pp. 31-58.
- Watanabe, C., Zhao, W. and Nasuno, M. (2012) âResonance between Innovation and Consumers: Suggestions to Emerging Market Customersâ, Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 3:1, pp. 7-31.
- Watanabe, C. (2013) âInnovation-consumption Co-emergence Leads a Resilience Businessâ, Innovation and Supply Chain Management, 7:3, pp. 92-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.14327/iscm.7.92.
- Watanabe, C., Naveed, K. and Zhao, W. (2014) âInstitutional Sources of Resilience in Global ICT Leaders â Harness the Vigor of Emerging Powerâ, Journal of Technology Management in Growing Economies, 5:1, pp. 7-34.
- Watson, B. and McDonagh, D. (2004) âSupra-functionality: Responding to Users Needs beyond the Functionalâ, Engineering Designer, 30 :5, pp. 8-11.
- World Economic Forum (WEF) (2013) The Global Information Technology Report, WEF, Geneva
- World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Database (2013) United Nations.
How to Cite
Chihiro Watanabe, Kasheef Naveed, Weilin Zhao. Structural Source of the Trap of ICT Advancement – Lessons from World ICT Top Leaders.
J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2014, 05, 49-71
Search
