The Positive Impact of Inter-Organizational Networking in Innovation in Biotechnology Industry: Comparative Case Analysis of Biotech Network One Nucleus
Home >
2012,
Vol. 3 No. 2 > The Positive Impact of Inter-Organizational Networking in Innovation in Biotechnology Industry: Comparative Case Analysis of Biotech Network One Nucleus
Authors
- Vivek VermaSchool of Economics and International Business University of Greenwich, Park Row, London, United Kingdom
- Vasilki T ZoumpaSchool of Economics and International Business University of Greenwich, Park Row, London, United Kingdom
Keywords
Inter-organizational networking, innovation, biotechnology industry, processual research, OECD, innovation output
Abstract
To further substantiate the role of inter-organizational networking in innovation, we explored the positive impact of large networks on innovation in the biotechnology industry. The research was conducted in two parts. In the first part, a qualitative research methodology using exploratory case study is performed on the three SME members of the UK-based biotech network One Nucleus. In the second part, a quantitative research approach using comparative empirical OECD data analysis is performed. The two research methodologies used are subsequently linked together thorough a unique research approach known as processual research. A new insight is explored regarding issues linked to inter-organizational networking, like the role of networks on organizational learning, the role of third party organizations within networks, diversity of partners and the nature of learning (localized vs. global) within biotech networks. The primary data is generated on the number of alliances, types of alliances and types of innovation, whereas innovation is measured as a dependent variable. Empirical results obtained clearly indicate that innovation output (patent approval rate, patent success rate) with respect to each alliance made by the sample firms is positively impacted by the parent biotech network One Nucleus.
References
- Accenture and Babson College (2004) âThe Drug Industryâs Aliance Archipelagoâ, (online) (cited 4 May 2010). Available from <URL:http://www.babsoninsight.com/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/649>
- Aharonson, B., Baum, J. and Feldman, M. (2004) âIndustrial clustering and the returns to inventive activity: Canadian biotechnology firms 1991â2000â. DRUID (Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics) Working Papers, nos. 04â03.
- Allen, R. (1983) âCollective inventionâ, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 4:1, pp. 1â24.
- Anne, L.J. and Wal, T. (2011) âThe dynamics of the inventor network in german biotechnology: Geographical proximity versus triadic closure, Evolutionary Economic Geography, pp. 1102.
- Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990) âComplementary and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnologyâ, Journal of Industrial Economics, 38:4, pp. 361â79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2098345.
- Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1994) âEvaluating technological information and utilizing itâ, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 24:1, pp. 91â114.
- Baker, A. (2003) âBiotechnologyâs growth-innovation paradox and the new model forsuccessâ, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 9:4 , pp. 286â88.
- Baum, J.A., Calabrese, T. and Silverman, B. (2000) âDonât go it alone: alliance network composition and startupsâ performance in Canadian biotechnologyâ, Strategic Management Journal, 21:3, pp. 267â94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8.
- Beuzekom, B.V. and Arundel, A. (2009) âOECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009â (online) (cited 18 June 2010). Available from <URL: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/23/42833898.pdf>
- Butler,J.E. (1988) âTheories of technological innovation as useful toolsfor corporate strategyâ, Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090103.
- Capello, R. (1999) âSpatial transfer of knowledge in high technology milieux: Learning versus collective learning processesâ, Regional Studies. 33:4, pp. 352â65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081211
- Chin, J. (2004) âBiotechnologyâs special forces: field based medical science liaisonsâ, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 10:4, pp. 12â18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040088.
- Clark, J. (1979) A Model of Embodied Technical Change and Employment, Sussex, UK: Science and Policy Research Unit, Sussex University.
- Damanpour, F. and Gopoalakrishnan, S. (1999) âOrganizational Adaptation and Innovation: The Dynamics of Adopting Innovation Typesâ, in Brockhoff, K., Chakrabarti, A. and Hauschild, J. (1st edn.) The Dynamics of Innovation, Berlin, Springer, pp. 57â80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03988-5_3.
- DeBresson, C. and Amesse, F. (1991) âNetworks of innovators: A review and introduction to the issueâ, Research Policy, 20:5, pp. 363â79. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90063-V.
- Dutta, S. and Weiss, A.M. (1997), âThe relationship between a firmâs level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreementsâ, Management Science, 43:3, pp. 343â56.
- Ettlie, J.E. (1995) âProduct-process development integration in manufacturingâ, Management Science, 41:7, pp. 1224â1237. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.7.1224.
- Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J. (1997) âTowards developing a methodology for doing qualitative research: the dynamic- comparative case study methodâ, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13:4, pp.439-455. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00028-6.
- Edwards, T. (2000) âInnovation and organizational change: developments towards an interactive process perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12:4, pp. 445â65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698496.
- Ettlie, J.E. (1995) âProduct-process development integration in manufacturingâ, Management Science, 41:7, pp 1224â1237.
- Gans, J. and Stern, S. (2004) âManaging ideas: commercialization strategies for biotechnologyâ, (online) (cited 4 March 2010). Available from <URL:http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/academic/biotech/articles/managing_ideas.pdf>
- Garcia, C.Q. and Velasco, C.A. (2005) âAgglomeration economies and vertical alliances: the route to product innovation in biotechnology firmsâ, International Journal of Production Research, 43:22, pp. 4853-4873.
- George, G. Zahra, S.A. and Wood, D.R. (2002) âThe Effects of Business-university Alliances on Innovative Output and Financial Performance: A Study of Publicly Traded Biotechnology Companiesâ, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, pp. 577â609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6.
- Glass, A.M.Wokaun, A. and Heritage, J.P. (1981) âEnhanced two-photon fluorescence of molecules adsorbed on silver particle filmsâ, Phys. Rev. B, 24:8, pp. 4906â4909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.24.4906.
- Goerzen, A. and Beamish, P.W. (2005) âThe effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performanceâ, Strategic Management Journal, 26:4, pp. 333â54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.447.
- Granovetter, M. (1998) âCoase revisited: Business groups in the modern economyâ, in Dosi, G. Teece, D.J. and Chytry. J. (eds) New Technology, Organization and Competitiveness, York, Oxford University Press.
- Gulati, R. (1995) âSocial structure and alliance formation patternsâ, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40:4, pp. 619â52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393756.
- Gulati, R. and Higgins, M.C. (2003) âWhich ties matter when? The contingent effects of inter-organizational partnerships on IPO successâ, Strategic Management Journal, 24:2, pp.127â44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.287.
- Hagedoorn, J. (1993) âUnderstanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differencesâ, Strategic Management Journal, 14:5, pp. 371â85. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505.
- Hinings, C.R. (1997) âReflections on processual researchâ, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13:4, pp. 493â503. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00023-7.
- Hirschler,B.(2007)âBiotech revenuestop $70 bln asM&Apremiumssoarâ,(online)(cited on 28 September 2010). Available from < URL:http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1534079120070415
- Johnson, J.D., Donohue, W.A., Atkin, C.K. and Johnson, S. (2001) âCommunications, involvement and perceived innovativeness: test of a model with two contrasting innovationsâ, Group and Organization Management, 26:1, pp. 24â52.
- Kogut, B. (1988), âJoint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectivesâ, Strategic Management Journal, 9:4, pp. 319â32. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090403.
- Kogut, B. (2000) âthe network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structureâ, Strategic Management Journal, 21:3, pp. 405â25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<405::AID-SMJ103>3.0.CO;2-5.
- Langlois, R.N. (1989) âEconomic change and the boundaries of the firmâ, in Carlsson, B. (eds) Industrial Dynamics, Technological Organizational and Structural Changes in Industries and Firms, Boston, Kluwer, pp. 85â108.
- Larson, A. (1992) âNetwork dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationshipsâ, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37:1, pp. 76â104. DOI:10.2307/2393534.
- Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. (2006) âBalancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formationâ, The Academy of Management Journal, 49:4, pp. 797â818.
- Lippitt, R.,Watson,J. andWestly, B. (1958) âThe dynamics of planned changeâ. New York: Harcourt. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002076406000500417.
- March, J. (1991) âExploration and exploitation in organizational learningâ, Organization Science, 2:1, pp. 71â87.
- Meyer, M.H. and Mugge, P.C. (2001) âMake platform innovation drive enterprise growthâ, Research Technology Management, 44:1, pp. 25â39.
- Milling, P.M. & Stumpfe,J. (2000) âProduct and process innovation a system dynamics based analysis of the interdependenciesâ, (online) (cited 26 September 2010). Available from <URL:http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2000/PDFs/milling1.pdf>
- Mohr, J.J. & Sengupta, S. (2002) âmanaging the paradox of inter firm learning: The role of governance mechanismsâ. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17:4, pp. 282 -301.http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08858620210431688.
- Mowery, D.C., J.E. Oxley, and Silverman, B.S. (1998) âTechnological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource based view of the firmâ, Research Policy, 27:5, pp. 507â23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00066-3.
- Nelson, A (2009) âMeasuring Knowledge Spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusionâ. Research Policy, 38:6, pp. 994-1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023.
- Oliver, C. (1990) âDeterminants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and futuredirectionsâ. Academy of Management Review, 15:2, pp. 241â65.
- Oliver, A.(2001)âStrategic alliances and the learning life-cycle of biotechnology firmsâ Organization Studies, 22:3, pp. 467â89. 10.1177/0170840601223004.
- Orton, J.D. (1997) âFrom Inductive to Iterative Grounded Theory: Zipping the Gap between Process Theory and Process Dataâ, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13:4, pp. 419-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00027-4.
- Oxley, J.E. and Sampson, R.C. (2004) âThe scope and governance of international R&D alliancesâ, Strategic Management Journal, 25:89, pp. 723â49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.391.
- Ozman, M. (2009) âInter-firm networks and innovation: a survey of literatureâ, Economic of Innovation and New Technology, 18:1, pp. 39â67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438590701660095.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. CA: Thousand Oaks. Sage.
- Perreault,W. D. and Leigh, L. E. (1989) âReliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26:2, pp. 135-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172601.
- Pettigrew, A.M. (1997) âWhat is Processual Analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13:4, pp.337-48.
- Pfeffer, J.and Salancik, M. (1978) âThe external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspectiveâ, New York. Harper and Row.
- Pisano, G.P. (1997) âThe Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovationâ, HBS Press, Boston, Mass.
- Porter, M. (1990) âThe competitive advantage of nationsâ, New York. Free Press.
- Powell,W. (1990) âNeither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizationâ, Research in organizational Behaviour, 12, pp. 295â336.
- Powell, W.W. Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) âInter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnologyâ, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41:1, pp.116â45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393988.
- Prahalad, C.K. and Mashelkar, R.A. (2010) âInnovationâs Holy Grailâ. Harvard business review, (online) (cited 17 July 2009). Available from < URL:http://hbr.org/2010/07/innovations-holy-grail/ar/1 >
- Ring, P. and Van de Ven, H. (1994) âDevelopmental processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationshipsâ, Academy of Management Review, 19:1, pp.90â118.
- Schumpeter, J. (1934) âThe theory of economic developmentâ, Cambridge. MA. Harvard University Press.
- Shan, W.Walker, G.and Kogut,B.(1994)âInterfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industryâ, Strategic Management Journal, 15:5, pp. 387â94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150505.
- Soh, P. and Roberts, E.B (2003) âNetworks of innovators:A longitudinal perspectiveâ, Research Policy, 32:9, pp. 1569â88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00065-9.
- Smith, O.J. and Powell, W (2004) âKnowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15:1, pp. 5â21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0054.
- Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J. (1990) âBasics of qualitative research: Grounded theory Procedures and techniquesâ, London. Sage.
- Summit Corporation Plc (2008) âSummit plc enters into a co-development agreement with the Lilly tb drug discovery initiative for tuberculosis programmeâ. (online) (cited 26 September 2010). Available from: < URL http://www.summitplc.com/uploads/08_summ_13tbfinal.pdf >
- Thorelli, H.B. (1986) âNetworks: Between markets and hierarchiesâ, Strategic Management Journal, 7:1, pp. 37â51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070105.
- Walker, G. Kogut, B. and Shan. W. (1997) âSocial capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry networkâ, Organization Science, 8:2, pp. 109.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984) âA resource-based view of the firmâ, Strategic Management Journal, 5:2, pp. 171â80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.
- Williamson, O. (1991) âComparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternativesâ, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36:2, pp. 269â96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393356.
- Whittington, K.B. and Smith, J.O. (2009) âNetworks, propinquity and innovation in knowledge intensive industriesâ, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 90-112.
- Wolf, F.M. (1986) âMeta-analysis: quantitative methods for research syntheses, London. SAGE
How to Cite
Vivek Verma , Vasilki T Zoumpa. The Positive Impact of Inter-Organizational Networking in Innovation in Biotechnology Industry: Comparative Case Analysis of Biotech Network One Nucleus.
J.Technol. Manag. Grow. Econ.. 2023, 01, 55-88