Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for University-Industry Creativity and Sustainability

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the growing recognition of the importance of university-industry partnerships, a significant gap exists in understanding how such collaborations can be optimized to foster sustainability and creativity in AI development.

Methods: This study examined the relationship between leveraging artificial intelligence and university-industry creativity and sustainability in Nigeria. A structured survey was used to gather quantitative data for the study.

Findings: The target population was the academics, entrepreneurs, and students in Nigeria's public universities. SmartPLS tools were used to analyze the data.

Implications: The findings suggest that university-industry sustainability and creativity are significantly influenced by the effective leveraging of artificial intelligence, such as research and development collaboration, technology transfer, and curriculum management.

Originality: The study's conclusions show that research and development collaboration, curriculum management, university-industry sustainability, and creativity have a significant association. According to the study, to achieve effective university-industry sustainability and creativity. Government, school administrators, and industry professionals should pay adequate attention to research and development collaboration, technology transfer, and curriculum management. This study proves that leveraging AI (research and development collaboration and curriculum management) positively correlates with university-industry sustainability and creativity. This study also shows how technology transfer can enhance university-industry sustainability and creativity.

Page Number : 31-47
Published Date : 2025-08-21
Keywords
Research and development collaboration, Technology transfer, Curriculum management, Sustainability
DOI Number
: 10.15415/jtmge/2025.161003
Authors
Nimota Jibola Kadir Abdullahi

References

Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell&Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2021). Managing entrepreneurial mindset towards bridging skill gap in tertiary education in Nigeria. International Business Education Journal, 14(2), 84–100. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/IBEJ/index
Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2022). Curriculum management strategies and effective implementation of universal basic education in Nigeria. ProfesiPendidikanDasar, 9(1), 55–70. https://journal.ums.ac.id/index.php/ppd
Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., &Aimran, A. (2020). An extensive comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for reliability and validity. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.003
Ahmad, F., & A. C. A., F. (2023). Leveraging generative AI solutions in art and design education: Bridging sustainable creativity and fostering academic integrity for innovative society. E3S Web of Conferences, 426, 01102. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/63/e3sconf_icobar23_01102.pdf
Aral, N., & Kiliçoğlu, E. A. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship education “early childhood.” International Journal of Commerce, Industry and Entrepreneurship Studies, 2(2), 702–712. https://utisgad.org/utisgad-2022-2-2-702/
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environment. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 1, 71–80. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED563985.pdf
Brem, A., & Radziwon, A. (2017). Efficient Triple Helix collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects – A case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 130–141. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v123y2017icp130-141.html
Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present and future. Triple Helix, 7(2–3), 189–226. https://researchportal.tuni.fi/en/publications/theorizing-the-triple-helix-model-past-present-and-future
Chedid, M., Carvalho, T., & Teixeira, L. (2020). University–software industry collaboration: An empirical study based on knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1–13. https://www.cipes.pt/university-software-industry-collaboration-empirical-study-based-knowledge-management?language=en
Chen, Z., Wu, M., Chan, A., Li, X., & Ong, Y. S. (2023). Survey on AI sustainability: Emerging trends on learning algorithms and research challenges. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 18(1), 60–77. https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03824
Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99–104. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1903635
De Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. (2018). International university–university technology transfer: Strategic management framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 145–155. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v135y2018icp145-155.html
De Wit-de Vries, E., Dolfsma, W. A., van der Windt, H. J., & Gerkema, M. P. (2019). Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: A review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1236–1255. https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/knowledge-transfer-in-universityindustry-research-partnerships-a
Dhiman, R., Miteff, S., Wang, Y., Ma, S. C., Amirikas, R., & Fabian, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence and sustainability: A review. Analytics, 3(1), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics3010008
Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Hassan, R., & Escobar, O. (2020). Artificial intelligence and business models in the Sustainable Development Goals perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 121, 283–314. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Artificial-intelligence-and-business-models-in-the-Vaio-Palladino/4dabbc4ff5b22def26576b04b078d1f45a997d85
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/18508861.pdf
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-fr/Internet,+Phone,+Mail,+and+Mixed+Mode+Surveys:+The+Tailored+Design+Method,+4th+Edition-p-9781118456149
Dudkowski, R. (2021). Managing value co-creation in university–industry partnerships: Evidence and implications for strategy, culture, and innovation performance. Springer Nature. https://books.google.com.ng/books/about/Managing_Value_Co_creation_in_University.html?id=ehvdzgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., &Krogstie, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence and business value: A literature review. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(5), 1709–1734. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v24y2022i5d10.1007_s10796-021-10186-w.html
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix innovation: Industry, university, and government in action. Routledge. https://mguntur.id/files/ebook/ebook_1605608206_cf742d707b4e0bf22bf3.pdf
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix: University–industry–government relations. A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 18–36. https://www.academia.edu/86748511/National_Innovation_System_and_Its_Role_in_Increasing_GDP_Per_Capita_Evidence_from_Russia_?f_ri=499103
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2020). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330
Hair, J. F., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://research.nottingham.edu.cn/en/publications/an-updated-and-expanded-assessment-of-pls-sem-in-information-syst
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v109y2020icp101-110.html
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hair, J. F., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Henderson, R., &Serafeim, G. (2020). Tackling climate change requires organizational purpose. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 177–180. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20201067
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2021). Sustainability innovations and firm competitiveness: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124715. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sustainability-innovations-and-firm-A-review-Hermundsdottir-Aspelund/62e7b99c922af3032a161137ed26c3e92370d2a1
Jirapong, K., Cagarman, K., & von Arnim, L. (2021). Road to sustainability: University–start-up collaboration. Sustainability, 13(11), 6131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116131
Kalu, A. A., & Peace, N. N. (2017). Assessment of entrepreneurial mindset on sustainability of Nigeria SMEs. International Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Research, 11(2), 1–16. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Assessment-of-Entrepreneurial-Mindset-on-of-SMEs-Ajike-Kalu/6bff5d3472f131239024281dab0859076bea6f0b
Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=Q61ECgAAQBAJ
Marijan, D., & Gotlieb, A. (2021). Industry–academia research collaboration in software engineering: The Certus model. Information and Software Technology, 132, 106016. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.11039
Mayer, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology (1st ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://www.pearson.com/en-gb/subject-catalog/p/introduction-to-statistics-and-spss-in-psychology/P200000004951
Miller, V. D., Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., Myers, K. K., Park, H. S., & Monge, P. (2013). Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 4–58. https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/advancing-research-in-organizational-communication-through-quanti
Minh, D., Wang, H. X., & Li, Y. F. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 3503–3568. https://sejong.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/explainable-artificial-intelligence-a-comprehensive-review
Mishra, S., Ewing, M. T., & Cooper, H. B. (2022). Artificial intelligence focus and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50, 1176–1197. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-19446-004
Mohadeseh, M., Zhila, F., & Azizallah, D. (2017). Effectiveness of positive thinking training program on nurses’ quality of work life through smartphone applications. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2017, 1–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446857/
Mugenda, A., & Mugenda, O. (2013). Research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. ACTS Press. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=648986
Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson Education. http://letrunghieutvu.yolasite.com/resources/w-lawrence-neuman-social-research-methods_-qualitative-and-quantitative-approaches-pearson-education-limited-2013.pdf
Obschonka, M., &Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: A new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55, 529–539. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapsbusec/v_3a55_3ay_3a2020_3ai_3a3_3ad_3a10.1007_5fs11187-019-00202-4.htm
Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Adekomaya, V. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence for advancing sustainable development goals in South Africa's higher education system: A qualitative study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 23–34. https://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/9733
Orazbayeva, B., & Plewa, C. (2020). Academic motivations to engage in university–business cooperation: A fuzzy set analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–13. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Academic-motivations-to-engage-in-cooperation%3A-a-Orazbayeva-Plewa/3cd1334fb57c85a5d8079bd80b0424dc4b65e030
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 681–695. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/136715/7/Purvis2018_Article_ThreePillarsOfSustainabilityIn.pdf
Ramayah, T., Hwa, C., Chuah, F., Ting, H., &Memon, M. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An updated and practical guide to statistical analysis.https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/44057278-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem-using-smart
Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 142–152. https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/10130/1/10130%20Sarpong%2C%20AbdRazak%2C%20Alexander%2C%20Meissner%20%282015%29%20Organizing%20practices%20of%20university%2C%20industry%20and%20government.pdf
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 587–632). Springer International Publishing. https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/sprsprchp/978-3-319-57413-4_5f15.htm
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2371540
Shi, X., Wu, Y., & Fu, D. (2020). Does university–industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese firms. Economic Modelling, 86, 39–53. https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/does-university-industry-collaboration-improve-innovation-efficie
Song, Y., Zhang, J., Song, Y., Fan, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, C. (2020). Can industry–university research collaborative innovation efficiency reduce carbon emissions? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120–132. https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v157y2020ics0040162520309203.html
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Barrón, Á.,Fernández-Morilla, M., Fuertes, M. T., Ruiz-Morales, J., Gutiérrez, I., García-González, E., Aramburuzabala, P., & Hernández, À. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability, 11(7), 2086. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2086
Van Wynsberghe, A. (2021). Sustainable AI: AI for sustainability and the sustainability of AI. AI and Ethics, 1, 213–218. https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/7qoxqQNl/
Vargas, V. R., Lawthom, R., Prowse, A., Randles, S., & Tzoulas, K. (2019). Implications of vertical policy integration for sustainable development implementation in higher education institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 733–740. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/210030/
Vazquez-Brust, D., Piao, R. S., de Melo, M. F. D. S., Yaryd, R. T., & Carvalho, M. M. (2020). The governance of collaboration for sustainable development: Exploring the “black box.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120–133. https://pure.port.ac.uk/ws/files/18444025/VAZQUEZ_BRUST_2020_cright_JCP_The_governance_of_collaboration_for_sustainable_development.pdf
Weng, S. S., Liu, Y., & Chuang, Y. C. (2019). Reform of Chinese universities in the context of sustainable development: Teacher evaluation and improvement based on hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model. Sustainability, 11(9), 5471. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i19p5471-d273037.html
Yıldırım, S. (2021). Do green women influencers spur sustainable consumption patterns? Descriptive evidence from social media influencers. Ecofeminism and Climate Change, 2(4), 198–210. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/achieving-sustainable-development-through-a-green-economy-approach/236723
Zhou, C., & Etzkowitz, H. (2021). Triple helix twins: A framework for achieving innovation and UN sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 13(12), 6535. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6535