Investigating the Effect of an Open Window vs. A Closed Window on the Concentrations of Suspended Particulate Matter in the Indoors with respect to the Outdoors

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted in New Delhi during peak winter to investigate the impact of open versus closed windows on indoor levels of PM2.5 and PM10, given the high ambient air pollution levels during this time.

Purpose: The aim was to determine whether opening windows affected indoor concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10, despite the prevailing belief that outdoor air quality significantly influences indoor air quality.

Method: A PM2.5 and PM10 air quality meter was used near a window at a single location for 10 days, with measurements taken nine times daily during working hours. The experiment involved alternating between open and closed window conditions to observe any significant changes.

Result: Contrary to expectations, opening or closing windows did not substantially alter indoor PM2.5 and PM10 levels. The study indicated that outdoor air might not significantly contribute to indoor particulate matter, suggesting minimal diffusion through open windows.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that isolation measures alone may not effectively reduce indoor PM2.5 and PM10 levels, as outdoor sources do not significantly influence indoor air quality even when windows are opened.

  • Page Number : 55–61

  • Published Date : 2022-10-30

  • Keywords
    Indoor air pollution, Suspended particulate matter, Windows operability, Indoor air quality, Indoors vs. Outdoors

  • DOI Number
    10.15415/jtmge.2022.132002

  • Authors
    Raja Singh, Tushar Mondal and Anil Dewan

References

  • Atkinson, J. (Ed.). (2009). Natural ventilation for infection control in health-care settings.
  • Escombe, A. R., Oeser, C. C., Gilman, R. H., Navincopa, M., Ticona, E., Pan, W., ... & Evans, C. A. (2007). Natural ventilation for the prevention of airborne contagion. PLoS medicine, 4(2), e68. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040068
  • Francisco, P (2019). Choked: The age of air pollution and the fight for a cleaner future. Granta Books.
  • Goyal, R., & Kumar, P. (2013). Indoor–outdoor concentrations of particulate matter in nine microenvironments of a mix-use commercial building in megacity Delhi. Air quality, atmosphere & health, 6, 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-013-0212-0
  • Guo, M., Xu, P., Xiao, T., He, R., Dai, M., & Miller, S. L. (2021). Review and comparison of HVAC operation guidelines in diff. W., Emmerich, S. J., Schoen, L. J., Hodgson, M. J., Mccoy, W. F., Miller, S. L., ... & Wargocki, P. (2020). ASHRAE position document on airborne infectious diseases by ASHRAE board of directors. Ashrae standard, 26, 26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107368
  • Gardiner, B. erent countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Building and Environment, 187, 107368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107368
  • Liu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Relations between indoor and outdoor PM 2.5 and constituent concentrations. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1089-4
  • Meng, Q. Y., Turpin, B. J., Korn, L., Weisel, C. P., Morandi, M., Colome, S., ... & Maberti, S. (2005). Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2. 5 concentrations: analyses of RIOPA data. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 15(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500378
  • Morawska, L., He, C., Hitchins, J., Gilbert, D., & Parappukkaran, S. (2001). The relationship between indoor and outdoor airborne particles in the residential environment. Atmospheric Environment, 35(20), 3463-3473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00097-8
  • Patterson, E., & Eatough, D. J. (2000). Indoor/outdoor relationships for ambient PM2. 5 and associated pollutants: epidemiological implications in Lindon, Utah. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 50(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10463986
  • Rizwan, S. A., Nongkynrih, B., & Gupta, S. K. (2013). Air pollution in Delhi: its magnitude and effects on health. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 38(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.106617
  • Singh, R., & Dewan, A. (2020). Rethinking use of individual room air-conditioners in view of COVID 19. Creative space, 8(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.15415/cs.2020.81002
  • Wang, F., Meng, D., Li, X., & Tan, J. (2016). Indoor-outdoor relationships of PM2. 5 in four residential dwellings in winter in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental pollution, 215, 280-289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.023
  • Wilson, P. (2007). Is natural ventilation a useful tool to prevent the airborne spread of TB?. PLoS Medicine, 4(2), e77. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040077
  • Xu, C., Liu, W., Luo, X., Huang, X., & Nielsen, P. V. (2022). Prediction and control of aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in ventilated context: from source to receptor. Sustainable cities and society, 76, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103416