Achieving Market Leadership: The Next Challenge for Technology Firms from Growing Countries

Abstract

Technology industries tend to follow a "winner-takes-all" model where the whole market belongs to an oligopoly of firms. Those companies are achieving an overriding position with a product or service whose dominant design is adopted by an overwhelming number of customers and makes it a de facto market standard. We have identified seven different moves used by the firms from the developed world to push their technology-intensive solutions to the market so that they become indisputable leaders. They offer a compatible or open technology to generate increasing returns; besides they create a supportive network; they also actively promote their technology through an aggressive branding; they go after the global market in order to reach the maximum volume of users; they minimize their production costs in order to lower their price and get to new customers; finally they constantly invest more than their competitors in order to reach a critical mass which make their solution unavoidable. Technology industries have long been dominated by companies from the developed world. However in the recent years, new players are coming from growing economies, especially from China for high tech products and India for technology services. In this paper, we will explore how those technology companies from growing countries -mostly China and India- can also apply those different actions in order to reach market leadership

  • Page Number : 9-28

  • Keywords
    Technology industries, growing countires, market leadership, technology standard, dominant model, complementors

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge.2010.12010

  • Authors

    • Eric ViardotEADA Business School, Spain

References

  • Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B.J. (1997) Co-Opetition: A Revolution Mindset That Combines Competition and Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy That's Changing the Game ofBusiness, New York, Doubleday Business.
  • Burke, W. L. and Schoeffler, S. (1980) Brand Awareness as a Tool for Profitability, The Strategic Planning Institute, Boston, MA: Cahners.
  • Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1985) 'Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation', RAND Journal of Economics, 16:1, 70-83.
  • Frick, K.A. and Torres, A. (2002) 'Learning from High-Tech Deals', The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 112-124
  • Kelleher, K. (2008) Window on the Future. (online). Available from http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/04/24/Microsoft-Earnings-Outlook.>
  • Mc Gee J., Sammut B. and Tanyut, A. (2002) 'Network Industries in the New Economy', European Business Journal, 14:3,116-133.
  • Prahalad, C.K. and Krishnan M.S. (2008) The New Age of Innovation. Driving Co-Created Value Through Global Networks, McGraw Hill: New York.
  • Steinbock, D. (2001) The Nokia Revolution: The Story of an Extraordinary Company that Transformed an Industry, New York, AMACOM.
  • Tatsumoto, H, Ogawa, K. and Shintaku, J. (2010) 'Standardization, International Division of Labor and Platform Business', MMRC Discussion paper N° 307. (online). Available from http://merc.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/mmrc/dp/pdf/MMRC307_2010.pdf>
  • Temporal, P. and Lee, K.C. (2000) Hi-Tech Hi-Touch Branding: Creating Brand Power in the Age of Technology, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons.
  • The Economist (2010) The Economist Special Report - Innovation in Emerging Marketsm, April.
  • UNCTAD (2009) World Investment Report, Division on Investment and Enterprise, (online). Available from http://www.unctad.org/>
  • http://www.bluetooth.com>
  • http://www.canalys.com/>
  • http://www.ft.com/global-brands-2009>
  • http://www.ft.com/reports>
  • http://www.gartner.com>
  • http://www.idc.com>
  • http://www.informationweek.com>
  • http://www.millwardbrown.com/2009_BrandZ_Top100_Report.sflb.ashx>
  • http://www.reuters.com>
  • http://www.spiegel.de>
  • Viardot, E. (2004) Successful Marketing Strategies for High Tech Firms, (3rd edn.), Artech House:Boston.

  • Published Date : --