Technology Leapfrogging: Findings from Singapore's Water Industry

Abstract

This paper illustrates Singapore’s strategy in catching up with global water treatment nations. Water is an important economic resource for Singapore, creating value-added jobs and stimulating research and development in various related technology trajectories. The analysis shows that from a nation lacking in competence in the water industry, Singapore has successfully transformed herself into a global hydrohub, exporting indigenous capabilities and offering consultancy for water projects. With long-term government policies and funding support for initial R&D and subsequent industry R&D inducement by means of the introduction of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) programme, Singapore has been able to build up her competence in waste water treatment. This is probably the first paper that analyses the development of the water industry in Singapore from the management of technology and policy perspectives.

  • Page Number : 29-47

  • Keywords
    Water Industry, Public Private Partnership, Global Hydrohub, Goverment stimulation, Singapore strategy, Water Treatment

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge.2010.12011

  • Authors

    • Michele Y.C. ChewNational University of Singapore, Singapore
    • Chihiro WatanabeTokyo Seitoku University, Japan
    • Yuji TouNiigata University, Japan

References

  • ADB (2008) (online). Available from http://www.adb.org/Water/Actions/sin/NEWaterSewage-Safe.asp>
  • Arrow, K.J. (1962) ‘The Economic Implication of Learning by Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29:3, 155-173.
  • Binswanger, H. and Ruttan, V.W. (1978) Technology, Institutions and Development, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
  • Chen, C. and Watanabe, C. (2007) ‘Competitiveness through Co-evolution between Innovationand Institutional Systems: New Dimension of Competitiveness in a Service-oriented Economy’, Journal of Services Research, 7:2, 27-55.
  • Economic Development Board Singapore (2010) A Global Hydrohub Factsheet 2010, Economic Development Board Singapore.
  • Gatingon, H. and Robertson, T.S. (1991) ‘Innovation Decision Process. In Robertson’, T.S. andKassarjan, H.H. (eds) Handbook of Consumer Behavior, Englewood Clifts, Prentice Hall.
  • Gregory, F.N. (2006) ‘Beyond the Learning Curve: Factors Influencing Cost Reductions in Photovoltaics’, Energy Policy, 34, 3218-3232.
  • Jovanovic, B. and Lach, S. (1989) ‘Entry, Exit, and Diffusion with Learning by Doing’, The American Economic Review, 79:4, 690-699.
  • Milieu (2009) Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, 2002.
  • Nelson, R.R. and Sampat, B.N. (2001) ‘Making Sense of Institution as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44, 31-54.
  • North, D.C. (1990) Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • North, D.C. (1994) ‘Economic Performance through Time’, The American Economic Review, 84, 359-368.
  • OCED Report (2010) Innovative Financing Mechanisms for the Water Sector, OECD, 2010.
  • Odum, E.P. (1963) Ecology, Holt, New York, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Soon, T.Y., Jean, L.T. and Karen, T. (2009) Clean, Green and Blue: Singapore’s Journey towards Environmental and Water Sustainability, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
  • Venkatraman, M.P. (1988) ‘Investigating Differences in the Roles of Enduring and Instrumentally Involved Consumers in the Process’, Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 299-303.
  • Watanabe, C. (1992) ‘Trends in Substitution of Production Factors to Technology: Empirical Analysis of the Inducing Impact of the Energy Crisis on Japanese Industrial Technology’, Research Policy, 21:6, 481-505.
  • Watanabe, C. (1999) ‘Systems Option for Sustainable Development: Effect and Limit of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry’s Efforts to Substitute Technology for Energy’, Research Policy, 28:7, 719-749.
  • Watanabe, C. and Asgari, B. (2004) ‘Impacts of Functionality Development on the Dynamism between Learning and Diffusion of Technology’, Technovation, 24:8, 651-664.
  • Watanabe, C. and Zhao, W. (2006) ‘Co-evolutionary Dynamism of Innovation and Institution’, In Yoda, N. Pariser, R. and Chon, M.C. (eds), Chemical Business and Economics, Chemical Society of Japan, Tokyo.
  • Watanabe, C. Moriyama, K. and Shin, J. (2009) ‘Functionality Development Dynamism in a Diffusion Trajectory: A Case of Japan’s Mobile Phone Development’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76:6, 737-753.
  • Williams, R., Slack, R. and Stewart, J. (2000) Social Learning in Multimedia, Research Center for Social Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

  • Published Date : --