Information Systems and Quality Management in Healthcare Organization: An Empirical Study

Abstract

The paper explores current status of information systems, identifies gaps in the current information systems and assessment in healthcare organization. This paper is based on Critical Analysis of literature and a questionnaire is administered on administrative level employees of South Indian healthcare organizations. It has been identified that healthcare organization should have specific strategy and must implement measures derived from strategy. Data and information systems should be seen as business resources. The knowledge base of medical field is large and it is growing rapidly. Hence information system must be integrated across the enterprise. The results of the study determined the relationship between measurement, analysis and knowledge Management on performance. The Information system is the newest dimension among the MBNQA (Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award) criteria. The Information system performance was assessed in terms of management relevant data and information. The outcomes suggest that there is a growing recognition of the administrators about the importance and use of information systems as a critical resource in healthcare organizations. From the study it is inferred that information system analysis continues to be a challenge. The higher utilization of technology, computerization and the Internet has resulted in dramatic change in the quality performance of the Healthcare Organizations. The paper provides an empirical evidence that information system has an impact on performance in the context of healthcare organizations. The information system is a key performance area of Quality management and it has received limited attention in improving quality performance including MBNQA. Finally, the study concludes that there is an immense scope for altering current information systems and it should be aligned with the quality management environment.

  • Page Number : 47-60

  • Keywords
    Information system, Quality Management, Performance, Healthcare Organization

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge.2011.21003

  • Authors

    • Sunil C. D'SouzaNational Institute of Technology, Surathkal, India
    • A.H. SequeiraNational Institute of Technology, Surathkal, India

References

  • Adelman, S., L. and Moss et al. (2005) ‘Data Strategy’, Addison-Wesley.
  • Austin, C.(1988) ‘ Health Information system’, Boston, MA, Houghton Muffin Company.
  • Banerji, K., Gundersen, D.E. and Behara, R.S. (2005) ‘Quality Management Practices in Indian Service Firms’, Total Quality Management, 16:3, 321-330.
  • Beise, C. M. (1989) ‘Assessment of the Information Systems Function: A study of the IS/Organizational Interface (Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University), Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 4010A.
  • Bell, R., and Keys, B. (1998) ‘A conversation with Curt W. Reimann on the background and future of the Baldrige Award’, Organizational Dynamics, 26:4, 51-61.
  • Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000) ‘A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation’, MIS Quarterly, 24:1, 169-196.
  • Bharadwaj, S.G., Varadarajan, P.R.and Fahy, J.(1993)‘Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Service Industries: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions’, Journal of Marketing, 57:4,83-89.
  • Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (2000) ‘Beyond computation: information technology, Organizational transformation, and business performance’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:4, 23-48.
  • G., Clarke, S. and Lehaney, B.(2000) ‘A Systemic View of Organizational Change and TQM’, The TQM Magazine,12:3,186-194.
  • Chow-Chua, C. and Goh, M., (2000) ‘Quality improvement in the Healthcare Industry: Some evidence from Singapore’, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 13:5, 223-229.
  • DesRoches,C.M., Campbell, E.G., Rao, SR., Donelean,K., Ferris,T.G., Jha, A., Kaushal, R.,Levy, D.E., Rosenbaum, S., Shields, A.E. and Blumental, D. (2008) ‘Electronic health records in ambulatory care - National survey of Physicians’ , The New England Journal of Medicine 359, 50-60.
  • Delone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (1992) ‘Information Systems Success: The quest for dependent variable’, Information Systems Research,11:3, 43-63.
  • Davis, G. B., and Olson, M. H. (1985) ‘Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structures, and Development’, New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W. C. (1995) ‘Multivariate Data Analysis’, 4th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Harris, S.E. and Katz, J.L. (1989) ‘Predicting organizational performance using information technology managerial control ratios’, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, 4, 197-204.
  • Hunt, R.G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindle, J. R. and Yousry, A.M. (1989) ‘Cognitive style and decision making’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 436-453.
  • India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) (2009) ‘Healthcare’, online (cited on 4th Feb 2010). Available from <URL: http://www.ibef.org>
  • Lengnick -Hall A.C.(1995) ‘The patient as the pivot for quality healthcare delivery’, Journal of the foundation of the American college of health executives, 40, 25-39.
  • Mahmood, A. and Mann, G. (1993), ‘Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: An exploratory study’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 10:1, 97-122.
  • Moad, J. (1993) ‘New rules, new ratings as IS reengineers’, Datamation, 39:21, 85-87.
  • B. L., Kappelman L. A., and Prybutok. V. R. (1997) ‘A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessment’, Journal of Information Resources Management, 10:2, 6-25.
  • I.S.T. (1995) ‘Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award: Criteria for Performance Excellence’, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • I.S.T. (2000) ‘Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award: Criteria for Performance Excellence’, Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • Nolan, Norton, and Co. (1985) ‘The economics of computing in the advanced stages’ Stage by Stage, European Issue (spring).
  • O’Connor, S. and Shewchuk, R. (1989) ‘The Influence of Perceived Hospital Service Quality on Patient Satisfaction and Intentions to Return’, Academy of Management, Best papers: Forth-ninth Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, Washington.
  • Pestonjee, D.M., Sharma K.H. and Patel, S. (2005) ‘ Image and Effectiveness of Hospital: An HR Analysis’, Journal of Health Management, 7:1, 41-90.
  • Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T. and Kavan, C.B. (1995) ‘Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness’, MIS Quarterly, 19:2, 173-187.
  • Powell, T. C., and Dent-Micallef, A. (1997) ‘Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 18:5, 375-405.
  • Prybutok, V. R. and Stafford, M. (1997), ‘Using the Baldrige criteria for self-assessment’ Marketing of Health Services, 17:1, 45-48.
  • Devaraj, R. Kohli (2000) ‘Information technology payoff in the healthcare industry: longitudinal study’, Journal of management information systems 16 (spring), 41-48.
  • Saunders, C.S. and Jones, J.W. (1992) ‘Measuring performance of the information systems function’, Journal of Management Information Systems, 8:4, 63-82.
  • Sangwan,R. and Bass, M. et al. (2007) ‘Global software development’, Hand Book , Auerbach Publication.
  • US DoCNBS (2003) ‘U.S department of commerce national institute of standards and technology’, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria for performance excellence, Washington, DC.
  • US DoCNBS (2008) ‘U.S department of commerce national institute of standards and technology’, Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria for performance excellence, Washington, DC.
  • Wilson, D.D. and Collier, D.A. (2000), ‘An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award causal model’, Decision Sciences, 31: 2, 361-390.

  • Published Date : --