Climate Change: A Paradigm Shift for Investments?

Abstract

Continuing with work of Rathee and Kapil (2013) on assessing the paradigm shift for investments due to climate change, this paper presents a review of the climate economics to add to the precious work on climate science. In its various sections the paper presents the economic treatment of climate problem as a market-failure from the perspectives of externalities and cost benefit analysis and reveals the dimensions of marginal abatement costs, and inter-generational equity. An assessment of likely total economic costs incurred due to climate change is presented to understand the scale of asset-value loss and economic risks faced by investors. We thereupon also investigate the various economic instruments that have been proposed by economists and implemented in policy for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change activity. In the penultimate section, a discussion is presented on challenges and opportunities for private investors in light of the climate economics revealed earlier in the paper. This research will add further to the work presented earlier in the series and adds another perspective of interdisciplinary dimension to the benefit of climate and economic researchers. For further action, the future researcher can build on this collective work to investigate for evidence on investable financial instruments that provide opportunities to allocate capital in the climate adaptation and mitigation related sectors.

  • Page Number : 73-88

  • Keywords
    Climate change, climate costs, climate economics, economic instruments, private climate investments

  • DOI Number
    https://doi.org/10.15415/jtmge.2014.52009

  • Authors

    • Sudeep RatheeIndian Institute of Foreign Trade, IIFT Bhawan, Qutub Institutional Area, New Delhi, India.

References

  • Agrawala, S. and Fankhauser, S. (2008) ‘Putting climate change adaptation in an economic context’, in Agrawala, S. and Fankhauser, S. (eds.) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: Costs, benefits and policy instruments, OECD, Paris, pp. 19-28.
  • Arrow, K. J. and Fisher, A.C. (1974) ‘Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty and Irreversibility’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88: 2, pp. 312-19.
  • Ayres, R. U. and Kneese, A. V. (1969) ‘Production, consumption, and externalities’, The American Economic Review, 59:3, pp. 282-297.
  • Boulding, K. E. (1966) ‘The economics of the coming spaceship Earth’, Radical Political Economy. Explorations in Alternative Economic Analysis, S, pp. 357-367.
  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. and Bishop, R.C. (1975) ‘Common Property as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy’, Natural Resources Journal 5, pp.713-27.
  • Coase, R. H. (1960) ‘The problem of social cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp.1-44
  • Cooper, R. N. (2000) ‘Internatonal Approaches to Global Climate Change’, World Bank Research Observer, 15:2, pp. 145-72.
  • Cooper, R. N. (2008) ‘The case for charges on greenhouse gas emissions’, October Discussion Paper 2008-10, The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements, Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Daily, G. C. (2000) ‘Management objectives for the protection of ecosystem services’, Environmental Science & Policy, 3:6, pp. 333-339.
  • Ellerman, A.D. and Decaux, A. (1998) ‘Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves’, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 40, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Ellerman, A. D. (2003) ‘Are cap-and-trade programs more environmentally effective than conventional regulation?’, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Mach, K. and Mastrandrea, M. (2014) ‘Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability’, Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report-Technical Summary, pp. 1-76.
  • Grubb, M. (2003) ‘The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol’, World Economics, 4:3, pp. 143-189.
  • Hahn, Robert W. and Gordon, L. H. (1989) ‘Marketable Permits: Lessons for Theory and Practice’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 16, pp. 380-391.
  • Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162:3859, pp. 1243-1248.
  • Hotelling, H. (1949) ‘An Economic Study of the Monetary Valuation of Recreation in the National Parks.’, Department of the Interior, National Park Service and Recreational Planning Division, Washington, DC.
  • IEA (2012) ‘Energy Technology Perspectives 2012’, OECD/IEA, Paris.
  • Montgomery, W. D. (1972) ‘Markets in licences and efficient pollution control programs’, Journal of Economic Theory, 5:3, pp. 395–418.
  • Mckinsey (2009) ‘Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve’, McKinsey & Company.
  • Morris, J., Paltsev, S. and Reilly, J. (2008) Marginal Abatement Costs and Marginal Welfare Costs or Greenhouse Gas Emissions reductions: Results from the EPPA Model. Report 164, Cambridge, MA: MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1991) ‘To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of The Greenhouse Effect’, The Economic Journal, 101:407, pp. 920-937.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1994) ‘Managing the Global Commons: the Economics of Climate Change’, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2007) ‘To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1:1, pp. 26-44.
  • Nordhaus, W. D., and Yohe. (1983) ‘Future paths of energy and carbon dioxide emissions’, Changing climate: Report of the carbon dioxide assessment committee, 87.
  • Nordhaus, W. and Yang, Z. (1996) ‘A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate Change Strategies.’, The American Economic Review, 86:4, pp. 741-765.
  • Pigou, A. C. (1924) ‘The economics of welfare’, Macmillan, London.
  • Rathee, S., and S. Kapil (2013) ‘Climate Change: A paradigm Shift for Investments? - A Review of Evidence under Climate Science Research’, Journal of Technology Management in Emerging Economies, 4:1, pp. 49-68.
  • Ridker, R.G. and Henning, J.A. (1967) ‘The Determinants of Residential Property Values with Special Reference to Air Pollution.’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49:2, pp. 246-257.
  • Rosen, S. (1974) ‘Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.’, The Journal of Political Economy, 82:1, pp. 34-55.
  • Stavins, R. N. (1995) ‘Transaction costs and tradeable permits’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29:2, pp. 133–148.
  • Stavins, R. N. (2008) ‘Cap-and-Trade or a Carbon Tax?’, The Environmental Forum, January / February, pp. 16.
  • Taschini, L. (2010) ‘Environmental Economics and Modeling Marketable Permits: A Survey’, Asian Pacific Financial Markets, 17:4, pp. 325 – 343
  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1985) ‘Emissions Trading Resources for the Future’, Washington, D.C.
  • The Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) (2012) “Macchart”. http://www.ecn.nl/macchart (accessed January 12, 2013).
  • United Nations (2010) Report of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing, New York, United Nations.
  • Ward, F.A. and Beal, D. J. (2000) ‘Valuing nature with travel cost models: A manual.'Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar.
  • World Bank (2005 - 11) State and Trends of the Carbon Market. World Bank

  • Published Date : --